Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=APS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Applied Psycholinguistics, 35 (2), pp 313-331 2014, © 2014 Cambridge University Press.
372 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - How are affective word ratings related to lexicosemantic properties?
T2 - evidence from the Sussex Affective Word List
AU - Citron, Francesca M. M.
AU - Weekes, Brendan S.
AU - Ferstl, Evelyn C.
N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=APS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Applied Psycholinguistics, 35 (2), pp 313-331 2014, © 2014 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Emotional content of verbal material affects the speed of visual word recognition in various cognitive tasks, independently of lexicosemantic variables. However, little is known about how the dimensions of emotional arousal and valence interact with the lexicosemantic properties of words such as age of acquisition, familiarity, and imageability, that determine word recognition performance. This study aimed to examine these relationships using English ratings for affective and lexicosemantic features. Eighty-two native English speakers rated 300 words for emotional valence, arousal, familiarity, age of acquisition, and imageability. Although both dimensions of emotion were correlated with lexicosemantic variables, a unique emotion cluster produced the strongest quadratic relationship. This finding suggests that emotion should be included in models of word recognition as it is likely to make an independent contribution.
AB - Emotional content of verbal material affects the speed of visual word recognition in various cognitive tasks, independently of lexicosemantic variables. However, little is known about how the dimensions of emotional arousal and valence interact with the lexicosemantic properties of words such as age of acquisition, familiarity, and imageability, that determine word recognition performance. This study aimed to examine these relationships using English ratings for affective and lexicosemantic features. Eighty-two native English speakers rated 300 words for emotional valence, arousal, familiarity, age of acquisition, and imageability. Although both dimensions of emotion were correlated with lexicosemantic variables, a unique emotion cluster produced the strongest quadratic relationship. This finding suggests that emotion should be included in models of word recognition as it is likely to make an independent contribution.
KW - AGE-OF-ACQUISITION
KW - EMOTIONAL WORDS
KW - LARGE SET
KW - CONCRETENESS
KW - VALENCE
KW - AROUSAL
KW - NORMS
KW - IMAGEABILITY
KW - FAMILIARITY
KW - FREQUENCY
U2 - 10.1017/S0142716412000409
DO - 10.1017/S0142716412000409
M3 - Journal article
VL - 35
SP - 313
EP - 331
JO - Applied Psycholinguistics
JF - Applied Psycholinguistics
SN - 0142-7164
IS - 2
ER -