Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How do radiologists do it? The influence of exp...
View graph of relations

How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. / Manning, David; Ethell, Susan; Donovan, Tim et al.
In: Radiography, Vol. 12, No. 2, 05.2006, p. 134-142.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Manning D, Ethell S, Donovan T, Crawford T. How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. Radiography. 2006 May;12(2):134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003

Author

Manning, David ; Ethell, Susan ; Donovan, Tim et al. / How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. In: Radiography. 2006 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 134-142.

Bibtex

@article{bbc15c4769964b938af3c1a1bb266870,
title = "How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules.",
abstract = "Four observer groups with different levels of expertise were tested to investigate the nature of expert performance. The task was the detection and localisation of significant pulmonary nodules in postero-anterior views of the chest. One hundred and twenty digitised chest images were used. The observer groups were 8 experienced radiologists, 5 experienced radiographers before and after six months training in chest image interpretation, and 8 undergraduate radiography students. Eye tracking was carried out to investigate differences in visual search strategies between observers. Detection performance was measured with an Alternate Free Response Operating Characteristic technique. Performance measures showed the experienced group of radiologists plus radiographers after training were better at the task than the remainder (t-test p = 0.046). Differences were shown in the eye-tracking parameters between the groups: saccadic amplitude (ANOVA p = 0.00047), number of fixations before and after training (t-test p = 0.041), and scrutiny time per decision and per film for the experienced versus the inexperienced observers (t-test p = 0.02). Visual coverage reduced with increasing level of experience but this result did not reach significance. Generally there were distinct differences in the search strategies between the experienced and inexperienced observers and we discuss the significance of these findings. We believe the results support some recent theoretical models of expert performance and that the findings may prove to be helpful in {\textquoteleft}fast-track{\textquoteright} educational programmes of image interpretation for non-radiology practitioners.",
keywords = "Expert performance, Pulmonary nodules, AFROC, Eye-tracking, Fixation patterns",
author = "David Manning and Susan Ethell and Tim Donovan and Trevor Crawford",
year = "2006",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "134--142",
journal = "Radiography",
issn = "1078-8174",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules.

AU - Manning, David

AU - Ethell, Susan

AU - Donovan, Tim

AU - Crawford, Trevor

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Four observer groups with different levels of expertise were tested to investigate the nature of expert performance. The task was the detection and localisation of significant pulmonary nodules in postero-anterior views of the chest. One hundred and twenty digitised chest images were used. The observer groups were 8 experienced radiologists, 5 experienced radiographers before and after six months training in chest image interpretation, and 8 undergraduate radiography students. Eye tracking was carried out to investigate differences in visual search strategies between observers. Detection performance was measured with an Alternate Free Response Operating Characteristic technique. Performance measures showed the experienced group of radiologists plus radiographers after training were better at the task than the remainder (t-test p = 0.046). Differences were shown in the eye-tracking parameters between the groups: saccadic amplitude (ANOVA p = 0.00047), number of fixations before and after training (t-test p = 0.041), and scrutiny time per decision and per film for the experienced versus the inexperienced observers (t-test p = 0.02). Visual coverage reduced with increasing level of experience but this result did not reach significance. Generally there were distinct differences in the search strategies between the experienced and inexperienced observers and we discuss the significance of these findings. We believe the results support some recent theoretical models of expert performance and that the findings may prove to be helpful in ‘fast-track’ educational programmes of image interpretation for non-radiology practitioners.

AB - Four observer groups with different levels of expertise were tested to investigate the nature of expert performance. The task was the detection and localisation of significant pulmonary nodules in postero-anterior views of the chest. One hundred and twenty digitised chest images were used. The observer groups were 8 experienced radiologists, 5 experienced radiographers before and after six months training in chest image interpretation, and 8 undergraduate radiography students. Eye tracking was carried out to investigate differences in visual search strategies between observers. Detection performance was measured with an Alternate Free Response Operating Characteristic technique. Performance measures showed the experienced group of radiologists plus radiographers after training were better at the task than the remainder (t-test p = 0.046). Differences were shown in the eye-tracking parameters between the groups: saccadic amplitude (ANOVA p = 0.00047), number of fixations before and after training (t-test p = 0.041), and scrutiny time per decision and per film for the experienced versus the inexperienced observers (t-test p = 0.02). Visual coverage reduced with increasing level of experience but this result did not reach significance. Generally there were distinct differences in the search strategies between the experienced and inexperienced observers and we discuss the significance of these findings. We believe the results support some recent theoretical models of expert performance and that the findings may prove to be helpful in ‘fast-track’ educational programmes of image interpretation for non-radiology practitioners.

KW - Expert performance

KW - Pulmonary nodules

KW - AFROC

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Fixation patterns

U2 - 10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.radi.2005.02.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 134

EP - 142

JO - Radiography

JF - Radiography

SN - 1078-8174

IS - 2

ER -