Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Human genetic banking

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent. / Williams, Garrath; Schroeder, Doris.
In: New Genetics and Society, Vol. 23, No. 1, 04.2004, p. 89-103.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Williams, G & Schroeder, D 2004, 'Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent', New Genetics and Society, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677042000189598

APA

Williams, G., & Schroeder, D. (2004). Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent. New Genetics and Society, 23(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677042000189598

Vancouver

Williams G, Schroeder D. Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent. New Genetics and Society. 2004 Apr;23(1):89-103. doi: 10.1080/1463677042000189598

Author

Williams, Garrath ; Schroeder, Doris. / Human genetic banking : altruism, benefit and consent. In: New Genetics and Society. 2004 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 89-103.

Bibtex

@article{1cb116ee56ec45b491d8f78906bafa08,
title = "Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent",
abstract = "This article considers how we should frame the ethical issues raised by current proposals for large-scale genebanks with on-going links to medical and lifestyle data, such as the Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council's 'UK Biobank'. As recent scandals such as Alder Hey have emphasised, there are complex issues concerning the informed consent of donors that need to be carefully considered. However, we believe that a preoccupation with informed consent obscures important questions about the purposes to which such collections are put, not least that they may be only haphazardly used for research (especially that of commercial interest)—an end that would not fairly reflect the original altruistic motivation of donors, and the trust they must invest. We therefore argue that custodians of such databases take on a weighty pro-active duty, to encourage public debate about the ends of such collections and to sponsor research that reflects publicly agreed priorities and provides public benefits.",
author = "Garrath Williams and Doris Schroeder",
year = "2004",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1080/1463677042000189598",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "89--103",
journal = "New Genetics and Society",
issn = "1463-6778",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human genetic banking

T2 - altruism, benefit and consent

AU - Williams, Garrath

AU - Schroeder, Doris

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - This article considers how we should frame the ethical issues raised by current proposals for large-scale genebanks with on-going links to medical and lifestyle data, such as the Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council's 'UK Biobank'. As recent scandals such as Alder Hey have emphasised, there are complex issues concerning the informed consent of donors that need to be carefully considered. However, we believe that a preoccupation with informed consent obscures important questions about the purposes to which such collections are put, not least that they may be only haphazardly used for research (especially that of commercial interest)—an end that would not fairly reflect the original altruistic motivation of donors, and the trust they must invest. We therefore argue that custodians of such databases take on a weighty pro-active duty, to encourage public debate about the ends of such collections and to sponsor research that reflects publicly agreed priorities and provides public benefits.

AB - This article considers how we should frame the ethical issues raised by current proposals for large-scale genebanks with on-going links to medical and lifestyle data, such as the Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council's 'UK Biobank'. As recent scandals such as Alder Hey have emphasised, there are complex issues concerning the informed consent of donors that need to be carefully considered. However, we believe that a preoccupation with informed consent obscures important questions about the purposes to which such collections are put, not least that they may be only haphazardly used for research (especially that of commercial interest)—an end that would not fairly reflect the original altruistic motivation of donors, and the trust they must invest. We therefore argue that custodians of such databases take on a weighty pro-active duty, to encourage public debate about the ends of such collections and to sponsor research that reflects publicly agreed priorities and provides public benefits.

U2 - 10.1080/1463677042000189598

DO - 10.1080/1463677042000189598

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 89

EP - 103

JO - New Genetics and Society

JF - New Genetics and Society

SN - 1463-6778

IS - 1

ER -