Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Human research ethics committees
View graph of relations

Human research ethics committees: beyond critique to participation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Published

Standard

Human research ethics committees: beyond critique to participation. / Batterbury, Simon.
In: The Australian Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2014, p. 385-386 .

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Batterbury S. Human research ethics committees: beyond critique to participation. The Australian Journal of Anthropology. 2014;25(3):385-386 .

Author

Batterbury, Simon. / Human research ethics committees : beyond critique to participation. In: The Australian Journal of Anthropology. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 385-386 .

Bibtex

@article{718c7f86d5c446ef8e388a697a002f39,
title = "Human research ethics committees: beyond critique to participation",
abstract = "The best way to smooth anthropologists{\textquoteright} progress through human ethics reviewis to participate in it. If the committee is knowledgeable and helpful, then an accusation of ignorance of anthropological methods is hard to sustain. This reflects my general academic philosophy; collegial service accompanies writing articles, getting grants and seeking promotion. HREC committee work is thankless, without personal kudos, and is largely unrecognised. It is more radical to deploy citizen power, than to complain about its absence in the ethics review process.",
keywords = "human ethics, Anthropology",
author = "Simon Batterbury",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "385--386 ",
journal = "The Australian Journal of Anthropology",
issn = "1035-8811",
publisher = "Australian Anthropological Society",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human research ethics committees

T2 - beyond critique to participation

AU - Batterbury, Simon

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The best way to smooth anthropologists’ progress through human ethics reviewis to participate in it. If the committee is knowledgeable and helpful, then an accusation of ignorance of anthropological methods is hard to sustain. This reflects my general academic philosophy; collegial service accompanies writing articles, getting grants and seeking promotion. HREC committee work is thankless, without personal kudos, and is largely unrecognised. It is more radical to deploy citizen power, than to complain about its absence in the ethics review process.

AB - The best way to smooth anthropologists’ progress through human ethics reviewis to participate in it. If the committee is knowledgeable and helpful, then an accusation of ignorance of anthropological methods is hard to sustain. This reflects my general academic philosophy; collegial service accompanies writing articles, getting grants and seeking promotion. HREC committee work is thankless, without personal kudos, and is largely unrecognised. It is more radical to deploy citizen power, than to complain about its absence in the ethics review process.

KW - human ethics

KW - Anthropology

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 385

EP - 386

JO - The Australian Journal of Anthropology

JF - The Australian Journal of Anthropology

SN - 1035-8811

IS - 3

ER -