Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > I take full responsibility, I take some respons...
View graph of relations

I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, Ill take half of it but no more than that: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, Ill take half of it but no more than that: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview. / Abell, Jacqueline; Stokoe, Elizabeth H.
In: Discourse Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, 08.1999, p. 297-319.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{287f0e69e9b14214a2d8e83c2eb747fe,
title = "I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, Ill take half of it but no more than that: Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview",
abstract = "The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways. ",
keywords = "accountability , blame , conversation analysis , discourse analysis , Martin Bashir , media , Panorama, Princess Diana , stake management",
author = "Jacqueline Abell and Stokoe, {Elizabeth H.}",
year = "1999",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1177/1461445699001003002",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "297--319",
journal = "Discourse Studies",
issn = "1461-4456",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - I take full responsibility, I take some responsibility, Ill take half of it but no more than that

T2 - Princess Diana and the location of blame in the Panorama interview

AU - Abell, Jacqueline

AU - Stokoe, Elizabeth H.

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.

AB - The focus of this article is the conversational management of blaming and accountability. In particular, we explore how involved speakers routinely allocate and avoid blame in everyday talk. In considering such a problematic notion of social interaction, we analyse the BBC interview between Princess Diana and Martin Bashir that was aired on British national television on 20 November 1995. In the analysis, we consider how different discursive strategies are employed by speakers in ways that work up credible and authentic accounts. More specifically, we argue that Diana attributes blame to external `others' within a negotiated context of routine description of past events. Categories such as `the media', `the royal household' and `Charles' are constructed and made relevant throughout the interview and the analytic interest is what is accomplished rhetorically for both Diana and Bashir. Of further interest is the overall script design of the interview and how devices such as script formulation, stake management, footing shifts and progressive narrative function in the negotiation of blame. We conclude that `doing blaming' is attended to and managed locally by participants in conversation and this `doing' can be accomplished in a number of ways.

KW - accountability

KW - blame

KW - conversation analysis

KW - discourse analysis

KW - Martin Bashir

KW - media

KW - Panorama

KW - Princess Diana

KW - stake management

U2 - 10.1177/1461445699001003002

DO - 10.1177/1461445699001003002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 297

EP - 319

JO - Discourse Studies

JF - Discourse Studies

SN - 1461-4456

IS - 3

ER -