Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John ...

Research

View graph of relations

I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'. / Tate, Andrew W.
In: Glass, Vol. 16, 2004, p. 14-30.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Tate, AW 2004, 'I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'.', Glass, vol. 16, pp. 14-30.

APA

Tate, A. W. (2004). I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'. Glass, 16, 14-30.

Vancouver

Tate AW. I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'. Glass. 2004;16:14-30.

Author

Tate, Andrew W. / I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'. In: Glass. 2004 ; Vol. 16. pp. 14-30.

Bibtex

@article{92e0383b9eb244b18e1397c25e680e57,
title = "I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'.",
author = "Tate, {Andrew W.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "14--30",
journal = "Glass",
publisher = "DMG World Media (UK) Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - I was guilty: interpretation as heresy in John Updike's 'Roger's version'.

AU - Tate, Andrew W.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 14

EP - 30

JO - Glass

JF - Glass

ER -