Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth : ...
View graph of relations

Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth : dissolving the puzzle of ‘imaginative resistance’.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth : dissolving the puzzle of ‘imaginative resistance’. / Todd, Cain Samuel.
In: Philosophical Studies, Vol. 143, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 187-211.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Todd CS. Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth : dissolving the puzzle of ‘imaginative resistance’. Philosophical Studies. 2009 Mar;143(2):187-211. doi: 10.1007/s11098-007-9198-5

Author

Bibtex

@article{659799acb15c4910afc1e19f6c7a48bd,
title = "Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth : dissolving the puzzle of {\textquoteleft}imaginative resistance{\textquoteright}.",
abstract = "This paper argues that there is no genuine puzzle of {\^a}��imaginative resistance{\^a}��. In part I of the paper I argue that the imaginability of fictional propositions is relative to a range of different factors including the {\^a}��thickness{\^a}�� of certain concepts, and certain pre-theoretical and theoretical commitments. I suggest that those holding realist moral commitments may be more susceptible to resistance and inability than those holding non-realist commitments, and that it is such realist commitments that ultimately motivate the problem. However, I argue that the relativity of imaginability is not a particularly puzzling feature of imagination. In part II, I claim that it is the so-called {\^a}��alethic{\^a}�� puzzle, concerning fictional truth, which generates a real puzzle about imaginative resistance. However, I argue that the alethic puzzle itself depends on certain realist assumptions about the nature of fictional truth which are implausible and should be rejected in favour of an interpretative view of fictional truth. Once this is done, I contend, it becomes evident that the supposed problem of imaginative resistance as it has hitherto been discussed in the literature is not puzzling at all.",
keywords = "aesthetics, fiction, fictional truth, moral judgement, imagination, imaginability",
author = "Todd, {Cain Samuel}",
note = "The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com",
year = "2009",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s11098-007-9198-5",
language = "English",
volume = "143",
pages = "187--211",
journal = "Philosophical Studies",
issn = "0031-8116",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaginability, morality, and fictional truth : dissolving the puzzle of ‘imaginative resistance’.

AU - Todd, Cain Samuel

N1 - The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - This paper argues that there is no genuine puzzle of �imaginative resistance�. In part I of the paper I argue that the imaginability of fictional propositions is relative to a range of different factors including the �thickness� of certain concepts, and certain pre-theoretical and theoretical commitments. I suggest that those holding realist moral commitments may be more susceptible to resistance and inability than those holding non-realist commitments, and that it is such realist commitments that ultimately motivate the problem. However, I argue that the relativity of imaginability is not a particularly puzzling feature of imagination. In part II, I claim that it is the so-called �alethic� puzzle, concerning fictional truth, which generates a real puzzle about imaginative resistance. However, I argue that the alethic puzzle itself depends on certain realist assumptions about the nature of fictional truth which are implausible and should be rejected in favour of an interpretative view of fictional truth. Once this is done, I contend, it becomes evident that the supposed problem of imaginative resistance as it has hitherto been discussed in the literature is not puzzling at all.

AB - This paper argues that there is no genuine puzzle of �imaginative resistance�. In part I of the paper I argue that the imaginability of fictional propositions is relative to a range of different factors including the �thickness� of certain concepts, and certain pre-theoretical and theoretical commitments. I suggest that those holding realist moral commitments may be more susceptible to resistance and inability than those holding non-realist commitments, and that it is such realist commitments that ultimately motivate the problem. However, I argue that the relativity of imaginability is not a particularly puzzling feature of imagination. In part II, I claim that it is the so-called �alethic� puzzle, concerning fictional truth, which generates a real puzzle about imaginative resistance. However, I argue that the alethic puzzle itself depends on certain realist assumptions about the nature of fictional truth which are implausible and should be rejected in favour of an interpretative view of fictional truth. Once this is done, I contend, it becomes evident that the supposed problem of imaginative resistance as it has hitherto been discussed in the literature is not puzzling at all.

KW - aesthetics

KW - fiction

KW - fictional truth

KW - moral judgement

KW - imagination

KW - imaginability

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-007-9198-5

DO - 10.1007/s11098-007-9198-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 143

SP - 187

EP - 211

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

SN - 0031-8116

IS - 2

ER -