Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Imagined sovereignty and the Indian subject
View graph of relations

Imagined sovereignty and the Indian subject: partition and politics beyond the nation, 1948–1960

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Imagined sovereignty and the Indian subject : partition and politics beyond the nation, 1948–1960. / Sutton, Deborah.

In: Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 19, No. 4, 15.12.2011, p. 409-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{c1572d982c674fb9ad767a758cf1514c,
title = "Imagined sovereignty and the Indian subject: partition and politics beyond the nation, 1948–1960",
abstract = "This article considers the jurisdiction assumed by the Indian state over populations of Indian origin in British territories after 1947. In an intense and often excessive treatment of the Indian subject as citizen, appropriate conduct was promoted, approved political organisations were patronised and behaviour regarded as delinquent was castigated. Using examples from Mauritius, East Africa, the West Indies and South-East Asia, this article examines this short-lived project as a means of interrogating the post-colonial Indian state and more general questions of post-colonial identity, jurisdiction and sovereignty. The terms of the directives sent by the Ministry of External Affairs were derived from domestic agendas and anxieties. A singular Indian identity, free from regional linguistic or religious difference, was promoted. Inevitably, however, this Indian identity was articulated negatively, through the identification of those considered to be communal, separatist and therefore {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}non-Indian{\textquoteright}. However, local populations in these territories were by no means passive recipients of the diplomats{\textquoteright} attention. In attempting to direct political action, the emissaries of the Indian state found themselves drawn into local political cultures over which they could not hope to exercise control.",
keywords = "sovereignty, India, jurisdiction, nationalism",
author = "Deborah Sutton",
year = "2011",
month = dec
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/09584935.2011.569700",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "409--425",
journal = "Contemporary South Asia",
issn = "0958-4935",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imagined sovereignty and the Indian subject

T2 - partition and politics beyond the nation, 1948–1960

AU - Sutton, Deborah

PY - 2011/12/15

Y1 - 2011/12/15

N2 - This article considers the jurisdiction assumed by the Indian state over populations of Indian origin in British territories after 1947. In an intense and often excessive treatment of the Indian subject as citizen, appropriate conduct was promoted, approved political organisations were patronised and behaviour regarded as delinquent was castigated. Using examples from Mauritius, East Africa, the West Indies and South-East Asia, this article examines this short-lived project as a means of interrogating the post-colonial Indian state and more general questions of post-colonial identity, jurisdiction and sovereignty. The terms of the directives sent by the Ministry of External Affairs were derived from domestic agendas and anxieties. A singular Indian identity, free from regional linguistic or religious difference, was promoted. Inevitably, however, this Indian identity was articulated negatively, through the identification of those considered to be communal, separatist and therefore ‘‘non-Indian’. However, local populations in these territories were by no means passive recipients of the diplomats’ attention. In attempting to direct political action, the emissaries of the Indian state found themselves drawn into local political cultures over which they could not hope to exercise control.

AB - This article considers the jurisdiction assumed by the Indian state over populations of Indian origin in British territories after 1947. In an intense and often excessive treatment of the Indian subject as citizen, appropriate conduct was promoted, approved political organisations were patronised and behaviour regarded as delinquent was castigated. Using examples from Mauritius, East Africa, the West Indies and South-East Asia, this article examines this short-lived project as a means of interrogating the post-colonial Indian state and more general questions of post-colonial identity, jurisdiction and sovereignty. The terms of the directives sent by the Ministry of External Affairs were derived from domestic agendas and anxieties. A singular Indian identity, free from regional linguistic or religious difference, was promoted. Inevitably, however, this Indian identity was articulated negatively, through the identification of those considered to be communal, separatist and therefore ‘‘non-Indian’. However, local populations in these territories were by no means passive recipients of the diplomats’ attention. In attempting to direct political action, the emissaries of the Indian state found themselves drawn into local political cultures over which they could not hope to exercise control.

KW - sovereignty

KW - India

KW - jurisdiction

KW - nationalism

U2 - 10.1080/09584935.2011.569700

DO - 10.1080/09584935.2011.569700

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 409

EP - 425

JO - Contemporary South Asia

JF - Contemporary South Asia

SN - 0958-4935

IS - 4

ER -