Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Impression management
View graph of relations

Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs. / Beattie, Vivien; Jones, Mike.
In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 9, No. 2, 06.2000, p. 159-183.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Beattie, V & Jones, M 2000, 'Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs', Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00030-6

APA

Beattie, V., & Jones, M. (2000). Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 9(2), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00030-6

Vancouver

Beattie V, Jones M. Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 2000 Jun;9(2):159-183. doi: 10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00030-6

Author

Beattie, Vivien ; Jones, Mike. / Impression management : the case of inter-country financial graphs. In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 2000 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 159-183.

Bibtex

@article{82de2ff1fe624b0282ecf46e4634d4b6,
title = "Impression management: the case of inter-country financial graphs",
abstract = "Previous literature on presentational impression management has not generally addressed the issue of whether certain countries are more likely to indulge in impression management than others. Two important forms of impression management (selectivity and measurement distortion) are investigated in the financial graphs of the corporate annual reports of 300 companies in Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the U.K., and the U.S. In particular, we examine (1) whether graphs of key performance variables (KPVs) (such as sales, earnings, earnings per share, and dividends per share) are more likely to be included when performance has increased rather than decreased, and (2) whether measurement distortion of KPV graphs are likely to give a more rather than a less favorable portrayal of company performance. In addition, we test the ability of the micro/macro classification of national accounting practices to explain differential national graphical reporting patterns. Some evidence is found of selectivity in graph usage (particularly in the U.S. and Australia, and for the earnings variable) and of measurement distortion (particularly in the U.S. and the Netherlands). The micro/macro classification does not adequately explain country differences, although there is some evidence that impression management is greater in those countries with strong capital markets.",
keywords = "Financial Graphs, Financial Reporting, Impression Management, International Accounting",
author = "Vivien Beattie and Mike Jones",
year = "2000",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00030-6",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "159--183",
journal = "Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation",
issn = "1061-9518",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impression management

T2 - the case of inter-country financial graphs

AU - Beattie, Vivien

AU - Jones, Mike

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - Previous literature on presentational impression management has not generally addressed the issue of whether certain countries are more likely to indulge in impression management than others. Two important forms of impression management (selectivity and measurement distortion) are investigated in the financial graphs of the corporate annual reports of 300 companies in Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the U.K., and the U.S. In particular, we examine (1) whether graphs of key performance variables (KPVs) (such as sales, earnings, earnings per share, and dividends per share) are more likely to be included when performance has increased rather than decreased, and (2) whether measurement distortion of KPV graphs are likely to give a more rather than a less favorable portrayal of company performance. In addition, we test the ability of the micro/macro classification of national accounting practices to explain differential national graphical reporting patterns. Some evidence is found of selectivity in graph usage (particularly in the U.S. and Australia, and for the earnings variable) and of measurement distortion (particularly in the U.S. and the Netherlands). The micro/macro classification does not adequately explain country differences, although there is some evidence that impression management is greater in those countries with strong capital markets.

AB - Previous literature on presentational impression management has not generally addressed the issue of whether certain countries are more likely to indulge in impression management than others. Two important forms of impression management (selectivity and measurement distortion) are investigated in the financial graphs of the corporate annual reports of 300 companies in Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the U.K., and the U.S. In particular, we examine (1) whether graphs of key performance variables (KPVs) (such as sales, earnings, earnings per share, and dividends per share) are more likely to be included when performance has increased rather than decreased, and (2) whether measurement distortion of KPV graphs are likely to give a more rather than a less favorable portrayal of company performance. In addition, we test the ability of the micro/macro classification of national accounting practices to explain differential national graphical reporting patterns. Some evidence is found of selectivity in graph usage (particularly in the U.S. and Australia, and for the earnings variable) and of measurement distortion (particularly in the U.S. and the Netherlands). The micro/macro classification does not adequately explain country differences, although there is some evidence that impression management is greater in those countries with strong capital markets.

KW - Financial Graphs

KW - Financial Reporting

KW - Impression Management

KW - International Accounting

U2 - 10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00030-6

DO - 10.1016/S1061-9518(00)00030-6

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 159

EP - 183

JO - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation

JF - Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation

SN - 1061-9518

IS - 2

ER -