Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Improving Inferences about Null Effects with Ba...

Electronic data

  • 2018.05.18_Lakens_McLatchie_Isager_Scheel_Dienes_Improving_Inferences_About_Null_Effects_With_Bayes_Factors_And_Equivalence_Tests_R1

    Rights statement: his is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Daniël Lakens, Neil McLatchie, Peder M Isager, Anne M Scheel, Zoltan Dienes, Improving Inferences About Null Effects With Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests, The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 2020 75: 45-57 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/75/1/45/5033832

    Accepted author manuscript, 575 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Improving Inferences about Null Effects with Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/01/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Issue number1
Volume75
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)45-57
Publication statusPublished
Early online date6/06/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Researchers often conclude an effect is absent when a null-hypothesis significance test yields a non-significant p-value. However, it is neither logically nor statistically correct to conclude an effect is absent when a hypothesis test is not significant. We present two methods to evaluate the presence or absence of effects: Equivalence testing (based on frequentist statistics) and Bayes factors (based on Bayesian statistics). In four examples from the gerontology literature we illustrate different ways to specify alternative models that can be used to reject the presence of a meaningful or predicted effect in hypothesis tests. We provide detailed explanations of how to calculate, report, and interpret Bayes factors and equivalence tests. We also discuss how to design informative studies that can provide support for a null model or for the absence of a meaningful effect. The conceptual differences between Bayes factors and equivalence tests are discussed, and we also note when and why they might lead to similar or different inferences in practice. It is important that researchers are able to falsify predictions or can quantify the support for predicted null-effects. Bayes factors and equivalence tests provide useful statistical tools to improve inferences about null effects.

Bibliographic note

his is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Journals of Gerontology: Series B following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Daniël Lakens, Neil McLatchie, Peder M Isager, Anne M Scheel, Zoltan Dienes, Improving Inferences About Null Effects With Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests, The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 2020 75: 45-57 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/75/1/45/5033832