Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inference for extreme values under threshold-ba...

Electronic data

  • PaperFeb2020

    Accepted author manuscript, 485 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules. / Barlow, Anna; Sherlock, Christopher; Tawn, Jonathan.
In: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), Vol. 69, No. 4, 01.08.2020, p. 765-789.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Barlow, A, Sherlock, C & Tawn, J 2020, 'Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 765-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12420

APA

Barlow, A., Sherlock, C., & Tawn, J. (2020). Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 69(4), 765-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12420

Vancouver

Barlow A, Sherlock C, Tawn J. Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics). 2020 Aug 1;69(4):765-789. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12420

Author

Barlow, Anna ; Sherlock, Christopher ; Tawn, Jonathan. / Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules. In: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics). 2020 ; Vol. 69, No. 4. pp. 765-789.

Bibtex

@article{71168de40f45406a9fea024e2cf0d9e9,
title = "Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules",
abstract = "There is a propensity for an extreme value analyses to be conducted as a consequence of the occurrence of a large flooding event. This timing of the analysis introduces bias and poor coverage probabilities into the associated risk assessments and leads subsequently to inefficient flood protection schemes. We explore these problems through studying stochastic stopping criteria and propose new likelihood-based inferences that mitigate against these difficulties. Our methods are illustrated through the analysis of the river Lune, following it experiencing the UK's largest ever measured flow event in 2015. We show that without accounting for this stopping feature there would be substantial over-design in response to the event. ",
author = "Anna Barlow and Christopher Sherlock and Jonathan Tawn",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rssc.12420",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "765--789",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)",
issn = "0035-9254",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inference for extreme values under threshold-based stopping rules

AU - Barlow, Anna

AU - Sherlock, Christopher

AU - Tawn, Jonathan

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - There is a propensity for an extreme value analyses to be conducted as a consequence of the occurrence of a large flooding event. This timing of the analysis introduces bias and poor coverage probabilities into the associated risk assessments and leads subsequently to inefficient flood protection schemes. We explore these problems through studying stochastic stopping criteria and propose new likelihood-based inferences that mitigate against these difficulties. Our methods are illustrated through the analysis of the river Lune, following it experiencing the UK's largest ever measured flow event in 2015. We show that without accounting for this stopping feature there would be substantial over-design in response to the event.

AB - There is a propensity for an extreme value analyses to be conducted as a consequence of the occurrence of a large flooding event. This timing of the analysis introduces bias and poor coverage probabilities into the associated risk assessments and leads subsequently to inefficient flood protection schemes. We explore these problems through studying stochastic stopping criteria and propose new likelihood-based inferences that mitigate against these difficulties. Our methods are illustrated through the analysis of the river Lune, following it experiencing the UK's largest ever measured flow event in 2015. We show that without accounting for this stopping feature there would be substantial over-design in response to the event.

U2 - 10.1111/rssc.12420

DO - 10.1111/rssc.12420

M3 - Journal article

VL - 69

SP - 765

EP - 789

JO - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)

JF - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)

SN - 0035-9254

IS - 4

ER -