Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Inferring complex AS relationships

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Inferring complex AS relationships

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Inferring complex AS relationships. / Giotsas, Vasileios; Luckie, Matthew; Huffaker, Bradley et al.
IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. New York: ACM, 2014. p. 23-29.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Giotsas, V, Luckie, M, Huffaker, B & Claffy, K 2014, Inferring complex AS relationships. in IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, New York, pp. 23-29, 2014 ACM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2014, Vancouver, Canada, 5/11/14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663743

APA

Giotsas, V., Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., & Claffy, K. (2014). Inferring complex AS relationships. In IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 23-29). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663743

Vancouver

Giotsas V, Luckie M, Huffaker B, Claffy K. Inferring complex AS relationships. In IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. New York: ACM. 2014. p. 23-29 doi: 10.1145/2663716.2663743

Author

Giotsas, Vasileios ; Luckie, Matthew ; Huffaker, Bradley et al. / Inferring complex AS relationships. IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. New York : ACM, 2014. pp. 23-29

Bibtex

@inproceedings{0c5459a872b2485ebdbdeb3a0ce886d1,
title = "Inferring complex AS relationships",
abstract = "The traditional approach of modeling relationships between ASes abstracts relationship types into three broad categories: Transit, peering, and sibling. More complicated configurations exist, and understanding them may advance our knowledge of Internet economics and improve models of routing. We use BGP, traceroute, and geolocation data to extend CAIDA's AS relationship inference algorithm to infer two types of complex relationships: hybrid relationships, where two ASes have different relationships at different interconnection points, and partial transit relationships, which restrict the scope of a customer relationship to the provider's peers and customers. Using this new algorithm, we find 4.5% of the 90,272 provider-customer relationships observed in March 2014 were complex, including 1,071 hybrid relationships and 2,955 partial-transit relationships. Because most peering relationships are invisible, we believe these numbers are lower bounds. We used feedback from operators, and relationships encoded in BGP communities and RPSL, to validate 20% and 6.9% of our partial transit and hybrid inferences, respectively, and found our inferences have 92.9% and 97.0% positive predictive values. Hybrid relationships are not only established between large transit providers; in 57% of the inferred hybrid transit/peering relationships the customer had a customer cone of fewer than 5 ASes.",
author = "Vasileios Giotsas and Matthew Luckie and Bradley Huffaker and K. Claffy",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1145/2663716.2663743",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450332132",
pages = "23--29",
booktitle = "IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference",
publisher = "ACM",
note = "2014 ACM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2014 ; Conference date: 05-11-2014 Through 07-11-2014",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Inferring complex AS relationships

AU - Giotsas, Vasileios

AU - Luckie, Matthew

AU - Huffaker, Bradley

AU - Claffy, K.

PY - 2014/11/5

Y1 - 2014/11/5

N2 - The traditional approach of modeling relationships between ASes abstracts relationship types into three broad categories: Transit, peering, and sibling. More complicated configurations exist, and understanding them may advance our knowledge of Internet economics and improve models of routing. We use BGP, traceroute, and geolocation data to extend CAIDA's AS relationship inference algorithm to infer two types of complex relationships: hybrid relationships, where two ASes have different relationships at different interconnection points, and partial transit relationships, which restrict the scope of a customer relationship to the provider's peers and customers. Using this new algorithm, we find 4.5% of the 90,272 provider-customer relationships observed in March 2014 were complex, including 1,071 hybrid relationships and 2,955 partial-transit relationships. Because most peering relationships are invisible, we believe these numbers are lower bounds. We used feedback from operators, and relationships encoded in BGP communities and RPSL, to validate 20% and 6.9% of our partial transit and hybrid inferences, respectively, and found our inferences have 92.9% and 97.0% positive predictive values. Hybrid relationships are not only established between large transit providers; in 57% of the inferred hybrid transit/peering relationships the customer had a customer cone of fewer than 5 ASes.

AB - The traditional approach of modeling relationships between ASes abstracts relationship types into three broad categories: Transit, peering, and sibling. More complicated configurations exist, and understanding them may advance our knowledge of Internet economics and improve models of routing. We use BGP, traceroute, and geolocation data to extend CAIDA's AS relationship inference algorithm to infer two types of complex relationships: hybrid relationships, where two ASes have different relationships at different interconnection points, and partial transit relationships, which restrict the scope of a customer relationship to the provider's peers and customers. Using this new algorithm, we find 4.5% of the 90,272 provider-customer relationships observed in March 2014 were complex, including 1,071 hybrid relationships and 2,955 partial-transit relationships. Because most peering relationships are invisible, we believe these numbers are lower bounds. We used feedback from operators, and relationships encoded in BGP communities and RPSL, to validate 20% and 6.9% of our partial transit and hybrid inferences, respectively, and found our inferences have 92.9% and 97.0% positive predictive values. Hybrid relationships are not only established between large transit providers; in 57% of the inferred hybrid transit/peering relationships the customer had a customer cone of fewer than 5 ASes.

U2 - 10.1145/2663716.2663743

DO - 10.1145/2663716.2663743

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84910139859

SN - 9781450332132

SP - 23

EP - 29

BT - IMC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference

PB - ACM

CY - New York

T2 - 2014 ACM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2014

Y2 - 5 November 2014 through 7 November 2014

ER -