Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Infrastructure provision, development processes...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Infrastructure provision, development processes and the co-production of environmental value

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Infrastructure provision, development processes and the co-production of environmental value. / Marvin, Simon; Guy, Simon.
In: Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 12, 12.1997, p. 2023-2036.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Marvin S, Guy S. Infrastructure provision, development processes and the co-production of environmental value. Urban Studies. 1997 Dec;34(12):2023-2036. doi: 10.1080/0042098975204

Author

Marvin, Simon ; Guy, Simon. / Infrastructure provision, development processes and the co-production of environmental value. In: Urban Studies. 1997 ; Vol. 34, No. 12. pp. 2023-2036.

Bibtex

@article{aec8bce2fc41420f906cc25ce4b03dc0,
title = "Infrastructure provision, development processes and the co-production of environmental value",
abstract = "This paper argues that the current debate about developer contributions in relation to infrastructure networks is blinding us to radical shifts emerging in the relationship between infrastructure providers and developers. Moreover, we suggest that conventional planning discourse about infrastructure charges, standardised service fees and impact assessment could actually hamper the emergence of this new logic. The paper illustrates how a new logic of network provision is subtly, yet profoundly, shifting the context within which the bargaining process unfolds by highlighting the proactive role of infrastructure providers in shaping the location, form and specification of three new developments. We argue that if debate is not extended to take account of these new infrastructure practices then planners will miss a significant new opportunity for promoting new communities of interest between actors who have conventionally been seen as adversarial and thereby encouraging environmentally sensitive development activity that may provide wider community benefits.",
keywords = "infrastructure, environment, urban development",
author = "Simon Marvin and Simon Guy",
year = "1997",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1080/0042098975204",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "2023--2036",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infrastructure provision, development processes and the co-production of environmental value

AU - Marvin, Simon

AU - Guy, Simon

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - This paper argues that the current debate about developer contributions in relation to infrastructure networks is blinding us to radical shifts emerging in the relationship between infrastructure providers and developers. Moreover, we suggest that conventional planning discourse about infrastructure charges, standardised service fees and impact assessment could actually hamper the emergence of this new logic. The paper illustrates how a new logic of network provision is subtly, yet profoundly, shifting the context within which the bargaining process unfolds by highlighting the proactive role of infrastructure providers in shaping the location, form and specification of three new developments. We argue that if debate is not extended to take account of these new infrastructure practices then planners will miss a significant new opportunity for promoting new communities of interest between actors who have conventionally been seen as adversarial and thereby encouraging environmentally sensitive development activity that may provide wider community benefits.

AB - This paper argues that the current debate about developer contributions in relation to infrastructure networks is blinding us to radical shifts emerging in the relationship between infrastructure providers and developers. Moreover, we suggest that conventional planning discourse about infrastructure charges, standardised service fees and impact assessment could actually hamper the emergence of this new logic. The paper illustrates how a new logic of network provision is subtly, yet profoundly, shifting the context within which the bargaining process unfolds by highlighting the proactive role of infrastructure providers in shaping the location, form and specification of three new developments. We argue that if debate is not extended to take account of these new infrastructure practices then planners will miss a significant new opportunity for promoting new communities of interest between actors who have conventionally been seen as adversarial and thereby encouraging environmentally sensitive development activity that may provide wider community benefits.

KW - infrastructure

KW - environment

KW - urban development

U2 - 10.1080/0042098975204

DO - 10.1080/0042098975204

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 2023

EP - 2036

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 12

ER -