Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘Inhabited Pasts: Monuments, Authority and Peop...

Electronic data

  • JAS_Inhabited_Pasts

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Asian Studies, ?? (?), pp ??-?? 2017, © 2017 Cambridge University Press.

    Accepted author manuscript, 658 KB, PDF-document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

‘Inhabited Pasts: Monuments, Authority and People in Delhi, 1912 – 1970s’

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Forthcoming
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/12/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Asian Studies
<mark>State</mark>Accepted/In press
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This article considers the relationship between the official, legislated claims of heritage conservation in India and the wide range of episodic and transitory inhabitations which have animated and transformed the monumental remains of the city, or rather cities, of Delhi. Delhi presents a spectrum of monumental structures that appear variously to either exist in splendid isolation from the rush of every day urban life or to peek out amidst a palimpsest of unplanned, urban fabric. The repeated attempts of the state archaeological authorities to disambiguate heritage from the quotidian life of the city was frustrated by bureaucratic lapse, casual social occupations and deliberate challenges. The monuments offered structural and spatial canvases for lives within the city; providing shelter, solitude and the possibility of privacy, devotional and commercial opportunity. The dominant comportment of the city’s monuments during the twentieth century has been a hybrid monumentality, in which the jealous, legislated custody of the state has become anxious, ossified and ineffectual. An acknowledgement and acceptance of the hybridity of Delhi’s monuments offers an opportunity to re-orientate understandings of urban heritage.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Asian Studies, ?? (?), pp ??-?? 2017, © 2017 Cambridge University Press.