Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relat...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. / Jessop, Bob.
In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 33, No. 7, 2001, p. 1213-1235.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jessop, B 2001, 'Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach.', Environment and Planning A, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1213-1235. https://doi.org/10.1068/a32183

APA

Vancouver

Jessop B. Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A. 2001;33(7):1213-1235. doi: 10.1068/a32183

Author

Jessop, Bob. / Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. In: Environment and Planning A. 2001 ; Vol. 33, No. 7. pp. 1213-1235.

Bibtex

@article{a250cc33e81541eb9648d91f2a13e229,
title = "Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach.",
abstract = "The author distinguishes and comments on three different forms of the institutional turn: thematic, methodological, and ontological. He argues that there is a wide range of institutional turns that have been undertaken for quite different theoretical, empirical, and policy-related reasons; and suggests that the returns from any given institutional turn are by no means guaranteed to be positive. The different senses in which `institutions matter' are explored and the need to contextualize the institutional turn, both at more macro and at more microlevels, is also emphasized. One way of undertaking this contextualization is through the `strategic ^ relational approach' with its concern with both the structural and the strategic dimensions of a contextualized institutional analysis. As well as presenting the approach in general terms, the author also illustrates its relevance to the spatiotemporal dimensions of institutional analysis. Eight broad conclusions about the institutional turn are presented.",
keywords = "Institutional turn, strategic-relational approach",
author = "Bob Jessop",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1068/a32183",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1213--1235",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach.

AU - Jessop, Bob

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The author distinguishes and comments on three different forms of the institutional turn: thematic, methodological, and ontological. He argues that there is a wide range of institutional turns that have been undertaken for quite different theoretical, empirical, and policy-related reasons; and suggests that the returns from any given institutional turn are by no means guaranteed to be positive. The different senses in which `institutions matter' are explored and the need to contextualize the institutional turn, both at more macro and at more microlevels, is also emphasized. One way of undertaking this contextualization is through the `strategic ^ relational approach' with its concern with both the structural and the strategic dimensions of a contextualized institutional analysis. As well as presenting the approach in general terms, the author also illustrates its relevance to the spatiotemporal dimensions of institutional analysis. Eight broad conclusions about the institutional turn are presented.

AB - The author distinguishes and comments on three different forms of the institutional turn: thematic, methodological, and ontological. He argues that there is a wide range of institutional turns that have been undertaken for quite different theoretical, empirical, and policy-related reasons; and suggests that the returns from any given institutional turn are by no means guaranteed to be positive. The different senses in which `institutions matter' are explored and the need to contextualize the institutional turn, both at more macro and at more microlevels, is also emphasized. One way of undertaking this contextualization is through the `strategic ^ relational approach' with its concern with both the structural and the strategic dimensions of a contextualized institutional analysis. As well as presenting the approach in general terms, the author also illustrates its relevance to the spatiotemporal dimensions of institutional analysis. Eight broad conclusions about the institutional turn are presented.

KW - Institutional turn

KW - strategic-relational approach

U2 - 10.1068/a32183

DO - 10.1068/a32183

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 1213

EP - 1235

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 7

ER -