Accepted author manuscript, 408 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: Other
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species
AU - Leal, C.G.
AU - Lennox, G.D.
AU - Ferraz, S.F.B.
AU - Ferreira, J.
AU - Gardner, T.A.
AU - Thomson, J.R.
AU - Berenguer, E.
AU - Lees, A.C.
AU - Hughes, R.M.
AU - MacNally, R.
AU - Aragão, L.E.O.C.
AU - de Brito, J.G.
AU - Castello, L.
AU - Garrett, R.D.
AU - Hamada, N.
AU - Juen, L.
AU - Leitão, R.P.
AU - Louzada, J.
AU - Morello, T.F.
AU - Moura, N.G.
AU - Nessimian, J.L.
AU - Oliveira-Junior, J.M.B.
AU - Oliveira, V.H.F.
AU - de Oliveira, V.C.
AU - Parry, L.
AU - Pompeu, P.S.
AU - Solar, R.R.C.
AU - Zuanon, J.
AU - Barlow, J.
PY - 2020/10/2
Y1 - 2020/10/2
N2 - Conservation initiatives overwhelmingly focus on terrestrial biodiversity, and little is known about the freshwater cobenefits of terrestrial conservation actions. We sampled more than 1500 terrestrial and freshwater species in the Amazon and simulated conservation for species from both realms. Prioritizations based on terrestrial species yielded on average just 22% of the freshwater benefits achieved through freshwater-focused conservation. However, by using integrated cross-realm planning, freshwater benefits could be increased by up to 600% for a 1% reduction in terrestrial benefits. Where freshwater biodiversity data are unavailable but aquatic connectivity is accounted for, freshwater benefits could still be doubled for negligible losses of terrestrial coverage. Conservation actions are urgently needed to improve the status of freshwater species globally. Our results suggest that such gains can be achieved without compromising terrestrial conservation goals.
AB - Conservation initiatives overwhelmingly focus on terrestrial biodiversity, and little is known about the freshwater cobenefits of terrestrial conservation actions. We sampled more than 1500 terrestrial and freshwater species in the Amazon and simulated conservation for species from both realms. Prioritizations based on terrestrial species yielded on average just 22% of the freshwater benefits achieved through freshwater-focused conservation. However, by using integrated cross-realm planning, freshwater benefits could be increased by up to 600% for a 1% reduction in terrestrial benefits. Where freshwater biodiversity data are unavailable but aquatic connectivity is accounted for, freshwater benefits could still be doubled for negligible losses of terrestrial coverage. Conservation actions are urgently needed to improve the status of freshwater species globally. Our results suggest that such gains can be achieved without compromising terrestrial conservation goals.
U2 - 10.1126/science.aba7580
DO - 10.1126/science.aba7580
M3 - Journal article
VL - 370
SP - 117
EP - 121
JO - Science
JF - Science
SN - 1095-9203
IS - 6512
M1 - eaba7580
ER -