12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intellectual property rights systems and the as...
View graph of relations

« Back

Intellectual property rights systems and the assemblage of local knowledge systems.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date05/2008
JournalInternational Journal of Cultural Property
Journal number2
Volume15
Number of pages21
Pages201-221
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The mounting loss of the traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples presents environmental as well as ethical issues. Fundamental among these is the sustainability of indigenous societies and their ecosystems. Although the commercial expropriation of traditional knowledge grows, rooted in a global, corporate application of intellectual property rights (IPRs), the survival of indigenous societies becomes more problematic. One reason for this is an unresolved conflict between two perspectives. In the modernist view, traditional knowledge is a tool to use (or discard) for the development of indigenous society, and therefore it must be subordinated to Western science. Alternatively, in the postmodernist view, it is harmonious with nature, providing a new paradigm for human ecology, and must be preserved intact. We argue that this encumbering polarization can be allayed by shifting from a dualism of traditional and scientific knowledge to an assemblage of local knowledge, which is constituted by the interaction of both in a third space. We argue that IPR can be reconfigured to become the framework for creating such a third space.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=JCP The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, International Journal of Cultural Property, 15 (2), pp 201-221 2008, © 2008 Cambridge University Press.