Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Interactional input and the incorporation of fe...
View graph of relations

Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. / Mackey, Alison; Oliver, Rhonda; Leeman, Jennifer.
In: Language Learning, Vol. 53, No. 1, 03.2003, p. 35-66.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mackey A, Oliver R, Leeman J. Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning. 2003 Mar;53(1):35-66. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00210

Author

Mackey, Alison ; Oliver, Rhonda ; Leeman, Jennifer. / Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. In: Language Learning. 2003 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 35-66.

Bibtex

@article{b32c1e23f2114b15950873973fdbeb65,
title = "Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads",
abstract = "Given the documented benefits of participation in communicative interaction (e.g., Gass & varonis, 1994; Mackey, 1999), the present study investigated the effects of interlocutor type on the provision and incorporation of feedback in task–based interaction. The interactions of 48 dyads, evenly divided among adults and children, and native speaker–nonnative speaker and nonnative speaker–native speaker, were analyzed to assess the effect of interlocutor on (1) amount of feedback, (2) opportunities for modified output, and (3) immediate incorporation of feedback. In all dyed types, at least 30% of errors resulted in feedback, much of which led to modified output. Analyses also revealed significant differences for amount, nature, and response to feedback according to dyad type.",
author = "Alison Mackey and Rhonda Oliver and Jennifer Leeman",
year = "2003",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1111/1467-9922.00210",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "35--66",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads

AU - Mackey, Alison

AU - Oliver, Rhonda

AU - Leeman, Jennifer

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - Given the documented benefits of participation in communicative interaction (e.g., Gass & varonis, 1994; Mackey, 1999), the present study investigated the effects of interlocutor type on the provision and incorporation of feedback in task–based interaction. The interactions of 48 dyads, evenly divided among adults and children, and native speaker–nonnative speaker and nonnative speaker–native speaker, were analyzed to assess the effect of interlocutor on (1) amount of feedback, (2) opportunities for modified output, and (3) immediate incorporation of feedback. In all dyed types, at least 30% of errors resulted in feedback, much of which led to modified output. Analyses also revealed significant differences for amount, nature, and response to feedback according to dyad type.

AB - Given the documented benefits of participation in communicative interaction (e.g., Gass & varonis, 1994; Mackey, 1999), the present study investigated the effects of interlocutor type on the provision and incorporation of feedback in task–based interaction. The interactions of 48 dyads, evenly divided among adults and children, and native speaker–nonnative speaker and nonnative speaker–native speaker, were analyzed to assess the effect of interlocutor on (1) amount of feedback, (2) opportunities for modified output, and (3) immediate incorporation of feedback. In all dyed types, at least 30% of errors resulted in feedback, much of which led to modified output. Analyses also revealed significant differences for amount, nature, and response to feedback according to dyad type.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9922.00210

DO - 10.1111/1467-9922.00210

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 35

EP - 66

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 1

ER -