Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Interactions under the desk

Electronic data

  • InteractionsUnderTheDesk-ACR

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_29

    Accepted author manuscript, 638 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Interactions under the desk: a characterisation of foot movements for input in a seated position

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Publication date30/08/2015
Host publicationHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany, September 14-18, 2015, Proceedings, Part
EditorsJulio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, Marco Winckler
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages384-401
Number of pages18
ISBN (electronic)9783319227016
ISBN (print)9783319227009
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer
Volume9296
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (electronic)1611-3349

Abstract

We characterise foot movements as input for seated users. First, we built unconstrained foot pointing performance models in a seated desktop setting using ISO 9241-9-compliant Fitts’s Law tasks. Second, we evaluated the effect of the foot and direction in one-dimensional tasks, finding no effect of the foot used, but a significant effect of the direction in which targets are distributed. Third, we compared one foot against two feet to control two variables, finding that while one foot is better suited for tasks with a spatial representation that matches its movement, there is little difference between the techniques when it does not. Fourth, we analysed the overhead caused by introducing a feet-controlled variable in a mouse task, finding the feet to be comparable to the scroll wheel. Our results show the feet are an effective method of enhancing our interaction with desktop systems and derive a series of design guidelines.

Bibliographic note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_29