12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Intercontinental impacts of ozone pollution on ...
View graph of relations

« Back

Intercontinental impacts of ozone pollution on human mortality.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

  • Susan Casper-Anenberg
  • J.Jason West
  • Arlene M. Fiore
  • Daniel A. Jaffe
  • Michael J. Prather
  • Daniel Bergmann
  • Kees Cuvelier
  • Frank J. Dentener
  • Bryan N. Duncan
  • Michael Gauss
  • Peter Hess
  • Jan Eiof Jonson
  • Alexandru Lupu
  • Ian A. MacKenzie
  • Elina Marmer
  • Rokjin J. Park
  • Michael G. Sanderson
  • Martin Schultz
  • Drew T. Shindell
  • Sophie Szopa
  • Marta G. Vivanco
  • Guang Zeng
Journal publication date1/09/2009
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Journal number17
Volume43
Number of pages6
Pages6482-6487
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Ozone exposure is associated with negative health impacts, including premature mortality. Observations and modeling studies demonstrate that emissions from one continent influence ozone air quality over other continents. We estimate the premature mortalities avoided from surface ozone decreases obtained via combined 20% reductions of anthropogenic nitrogen oxide, non-methane volatile organic compound, and carbon monoxide emissions in North America (NA), East Asia (EA), South Asia (SA), and Europe (EU). We use estimates of ozone responses to these emission changes from several atmospheric chemical transport models combined with a health impact function. Foreign emission reductions contribute approximately 30%, 30%, 20%, and >50% of the mortalities avoided by reducing precursor emissions in all regions together in NA, EA, SA, and EU, respectively. Reducing emissions in NA and EU avoids more mortalities outside the source region than within, owing in part to larger populations in foreign regions. Lowering the global methane abundance by 20% reduces mortality most in SA, followed by EU, EA, and NA. For some source−receptor pairs, there is greater uncertainty in our estimated avoided mortalities associated with the modeled ozone responses to emission changes than with the health impact function parameters.

Related projects