Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > International transformations of the capitalist...
View graph of relations

International transformations of the capitalist state.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

International transformations of the capitalist state. / Picciotto, Salomone.
In: Antipode, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 87-107.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Picciotto S. International transformations of the capitalist state. Antipode. 2011 Jan;43(1):87-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00812.x

Author

Picciotto, Salomone. / International transformations of the capitalist state. In: Antipode. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 87-107.

Bibtex

@article{12b99eac2d624d49a505371cfae722c7,
title = "International transformations of the capitalist state.",
abstract = "There has not been a retreat but a transformation of the state, involving significant changes in both the public sphere of politics and the so-called private sphere of economic activity, and in their modes of interaction, especially law. The privatization of state-owned assets and the reduction of direct state economic intervention have not led to a reduced role of the state but to changes in its form, involving new types of formalized regulation, the fragmentation of the public sphere, the decentering of the state and the emergence of multi-level governance. This has been complemented by the increased salience of “private” regulation, so that in many ways the apparently private sphere of economic activity has become more public. In fact, there has been a complex process of interaction with a blurring of the divisions between apparently private and public regulation. Despite talk of deregulation there has been extensive reregulation, or formalization of regulation, and the emergence of global regulatory networks, intermingling the public and the private. The transition from government to governance means a lack of a clear hierarchy of norms, a blurring of distinctions between hard and soft law, and a fragmentation of public functions entailing a resurgence of technocracy.",
keywords = "internationalisation state globalisation governance regulation networks",
author = "Salomone Picciotto",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00812.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "87--107",
journal = "Antipode",
issn = "0066-4812",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - International transformations of the capitalist state.

AU - Picciotto, Salomone

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - There has not been a retreat but a transformation of the state, involving significant changes in both the public sphere of politics and the so-called private sphere of economic activity, and in their modes of interaction, especially law. The privatization of state-owned assets and the reduction of direct state economic intervention have not led to a reduced role of the state but to changes in its form, involving new types of formalized regulation, the fragmentation of the public sphere, the decentering of the state and the emergence of multi-level governance. This has been complemented by the increased salience of “private” regulation, so that in many ways the apparently private sphere of economic activity has become more public. In fact, there has been a complex process of interaction with a blurring of the divisions between apparently private and public regulation. Despite talk of deregulation there has been extensive reregulation, or formalization of regulation, and the emergence of global regulatory networks, intermingling the public and the private. The transition from government to governance means a lack of a clear hierarchy of norms, a blurring of distinctions between hard and soft law, and a fragmentation of public functions entailing a resurgence of technocracy.

AB - There has not been a retreat but a transformation of the state, involving significant changes in both the public sphere of politics and the so-called private sphere of economic activity, and in their modes of interaction, especially law. The privatization of state-owned assets and the reduction of direct state economic intervention have not led to a reduced role of the state but to changes in its form, involving new types of formalized regulation, the fragmentation of the public sphere, the decentering of the state and the emergence of multi-level governance. This has been complemented by the increased salience of “private” regulation, so that in many ways the apparently private sphere of economic activity has become more public. In fact, there has been a complex process of interaction with a blurring of the divisions between apparently private and public regulation. Despite talk of deregulation there has been extensive reregulation, or formalization of regulation, and the emergence of global regulatory networks, intermingling the public and the private. The transition from government to governance means a lack of a clear hierarchy of norms, a blurring of distinctions between hard and soft law, and a fragmentation of public functions entailing a resurgence of technocracy.

KW - internationalisation state globalisation governance regulation networks

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00812.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00812.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 87

EP - 107

JO - Antipode

JF - Antipode

SN - 0066-4812

IS - 1

ER -