Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Introducing service improvement to the initial ...
View graph of relations

Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff. / Johnson, Neil; Penny, Jean; Dilys, Robinson et al.
In: Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 19, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 205-207.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Johnson, N, Penny, J, Dilys, R, Cooke, MW, Fowler-Davis, S, Janes, G & Lister, S 2010, 'Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff', Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.024984

APA

Johnson, N., Penny, J., Dilys, R., Cooke, M. W., Fowler-Davis, S., Janes, G., & Lister, S. (2010). Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(3), 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.024984

Vancouver

Johnson N, Penny J, Dilys R, Cooke MW, Fowler-Davis S, Janes G et al. Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010 Jun;19(3):205-207. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024984

Author

Johnson, Neil ; Penny, Jean ; Dilys, Robinson et al. / Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff. In: Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 205-207.

Bibtex

@article{12eb5891b2db44949872cd7a94104bfd,
title = "Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: It is well recognised in healthcare settings that clinical staff have a major influence over change in how services are provided. If a culture of systematic service improvement is to be established, it is essential that clinical staff have an understanding of what is required and their role in its application.METHODS: This paper describes the development of short educational interventions (a module of 6-8 contact hours or a longer module of 18-30 h) for inclusion in the initial training of future clinical staff (nursing, medicine, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics, social work, operating department practice, public health and clinical psychology) and presents the results of an evaluation of their introduction. Each module included teaching on process/systems thinking, initiating and sustaining change, personal and organisational development, and public and patient involvement.RESULTS: Over 90% of students considered the modules relevant to their career. Nearly 90% of students felt that they could put their learning into practice, although the actual rate of implementation of changes during the pilot period was much lower. The barriers to implementation most commonly cited were blocks presented by existing staff, lack of time and lack of status of students within the workforce.CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrates that short educational interventions focused on service improvement are valued by students and that those completing them feel ready to contribute. Nevertheless, the rate of translation into practice is low. While this may reflect the status of students in the health service, further research is needed to understand how this might be enhanced.",
keywords = "Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Education, Nursing, Education, Public Health Professional, Efficiency, Organizational, Great Britain, Health Personnel, Humans, Internal Medicine, Organizational Innovation, Pilot Projects, State Medicine, Time Factors",
author = "Neil Johnson and Jean Penny and Robinson Dilys and Cooke, {Matthew W.} and Sally Fowler-Davis and Gillian Janes and Sue Lister",
year = "2010",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2007.024984",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "205--207",
journal = "Quality and Safety in Health Care",
issn = "1470-7934",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing service improvement to the initial training of clinical staff

AU - Johnson, Neil

AU - Penny, Jean

AU - Dilys, Robinson

AU - Cooke, Matthew W.

AU - Fowler-Davis, Sally

AU - Janes, Gillian

AU - Lister, Sue

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: It is well recognised in healthcare settings that clinical staff have a major influence over change in how services are provided. If a culture of systematic service improvement is to be established, it is essential that clinical staff have an understanding of what is required and their role in its application.METHODS: This paper describes the development of short educational interventions (a module of 6-8 contact hours or a longer module of 18-30 h) for inclusion in the initial training of future clinical staff (nursing, medicine, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics, social work, operating department practice, public health and clinical psychology) and presents the results of an evaluation of their introduction. Each module included teaching on process/systems thinking, initiating and sustaining change, personal and organisational development, and public and patient involvement.RESULTS: Over 90% of students considered the modules relevant to their career. Nearly 90% of students felt that they could put their learning into practice, although the actual rate of implementation of changes during the pilot period was much lower. The barriers to implementation most commonly cited were blocks presented by existing staff, lack of time and lack of status of students within the workforce.CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrates that short educational interventions focused on service improvement are valued by students and that those completing them feel ready to contribute. Nevertheless, the rate of translation into practice is low. While this may reflect the status of students in the health service, further research is needed to understand how this might be enhanced.

AB - BACKGROUND: It is well recognised in healthcare settings that clinical staff have a major influence over change in how services are provided. If a culture of systematic service improvement is to be established, it is essential that clinical staff have an understanding of what is required and their role in its application.METHODS: This paper describes the development of short educational interventions (a module of 6-8 contact hours or a longer module of 18-30 h) for inclusion in the initial training of future clinical staff (nursing, medicine, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics, social work, operating department practice, public health and clinical psychology) and presents the results of an evaluation of their introduction. Each module included teaching on process/systems thinking, initiating and sustaining change, personal and organisational development, and public and patient involvement.RESULTS: Over 90% of students considered the modules relevant to their career. Nearly 90% of students felt that they could put their learning into practice, although the actual rate of implementation of changes during the pilot period was much lower. The barriers to implementation most commonly cited were blocks presented by existing staff, lack of time and lack of status of students within the workforce.CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrates that short educational interventions focused on service improvement are valued by students and that those completing them feel ready to contribute. Nevertheless, the rate of translation into practice is low. While this may reflect the status of students in the health service, further research is needed to understand how this might be enhanced.

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Curriculum

KW - Education, Medical

KW - Education, Nursing

KW - Education, Public Health Professional

KW - Efficiency, Organizational

KW - Great Britain

KW - Health Personnel

KW - Humans

KW - Internal Medicine

KW - Organizational Innovation

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - State Medicine

KW - Time Factors

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2007.024984

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2007.024984

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20378620

VL - 19

SP - 205

EP - 207

JO - Quality and Safety in Health Care

JF - Quality and Safety in Health Care

SN - 1470-7934

IS - 3

ER -