Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Investigating the relationship between fast map...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • revised manuscript2

    Accepted author manuscript, 7.28 MB, Word document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Investigating the relationship between fast mapping, retention, and generalisation of words in children with autism spectrum disorder and typical development.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{be4a5a0f6e5b4a44a92fb1b615155bea,
title = "Investigating the relationship between fast mapping, retention, and generalisation of words in children with autism spectrum disorder and typical development.",
abstract = "While many studies have investigated how autism spectrum disorder (ASD) impacts how children identify the meanings of new words, this task alone does not constitute learning. Here we investigate fast (referent selection) and slow (retention, generalisation) word learning processes as an integrated system and explore relationships between these mechanisms in ASD and typical development. In Study 1, children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children matched on receptive vocabulary utilised mutual exclusivity to identify referents of unfamiliar words, but showed substantially reduced accuracy on delayed retention and generalisation trials. Thus, Study 2 investigated whether re-directing children{\textquoteright}s attention to target objects following referent selection would enhance delayed retention. Participants received either social feedback (target objects were labelled and highlighted via social cues) or non-social feedback (target objects were labelled and highlighted via a flashing light). In both conditions, children with ASD were less accurate in their use of mutual exclusivity to fast-map novel words than TD children. However, children with ASD who received social feedback responded more accurately on delayed retention and generalisation trials than TD controls, and children with ASD who received non-social feedback or no feedback (in Study 1). Our findings imply that fundamental word learning mechanisms, and the relationships between them, are not qualitatively different in ASD. We argue that ASD may affect the efficiency of these mechanisms by disrupting children{\textquoteright}s intake of linguistic input in natural environments, but difficulties may be mitigated by presenting visual and auditory stimuli in a way that appeals to the population{\textquoteright}s strengths. ",
keywords = "Autism spectrum disorder, Word learning, fast mapping, retention, generalisation, Typical development",
author = "Hartley, {Calum Keith} and Laura-Ashleigh Bird and Monaghan, {Padraic John}",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "187",
pages = "126--138",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the relationship between fast mapping, retention, and generalisation of words in children with autism spectrum disorder and typical development.

AU - Hartley, Calum Keith

AU - Bird, Laura-Ashleigh

AU - Monaghan, Padraic John

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - While many studies have investigated how autism spectrum disorder (ASD) impacts how children identify the meanings of new words, this task alone does not constitute learning. Here we investigate fast (referent selection) and slow (retention, generalisation) word learning processes as an integrated system and explore relationships between these mechanisms in ASD and typical development. In Study 1, children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children matched on receptive vocabulary utilised mutual exclusivity to identify referents of unfamiliar words, but showed substantially reduced accuracy on delayed retention and generalisation trials. Thus, Study 2 investigated whether re-directing children’s attention to target objects following referent selection would enhance delayed retention. Participants received either social feedback (target objects were labelled and highlighted via social cues) or non-social feedback (target objects were labelled and highlighted via a flashing light). In both conditions, children with ASD were less accurate in their use of mutual exclusivity to fast-map novel words than TD children. However, children with ASD who received social feedback responded more accurately on delayed retention and generalisation trials than TD controls, and children with ASD who received non-social feedback or no feedback (in Study 1). Our findings imply that fundamental word learning mechanisms, and the relationships between them, are not qualitatively different in ASD. We argue that ASD may affect the efficiency of these mechanisms by disrupting children’s intake of linguistic input in natural environments, but difficulties may be mitigated by presenting visual and auditory stimuli in a way that appeals to the population’s strengths.

AB - While many studies have investigated how autism spectrum disorder (ASD) impacts how children identify the meanings of new words, this task alone does not constitute learning. Here we investigate fast (referent selection) and slow (retention, generalisation) word learning processes as an integrated system and explore relationships between these mechanisms in ASD and typical development. In Study 1, children with ASD and typically developing (TD) children matched on receptive vocabulary utilised mutual exclusivity to identify referents of unfamiliar words, but showed substantially reduced accuracy on delayed retention and generalisation trials. Thus, Study 2 investigated whether re-directing children’s attention to target objects following referent selection would enhance delayed retention. Participants received either social feedback (target objects were labelled and highlighted via social cues) or non-social feedback (target objects were labelled and highlighted via a flashing light). In both conditions, children with ASD were less accurate in their use of mutual exclusivity to fast-map novel words than TD children. However, children with ASD who received social feedback responded more accurately on delayed retention and generalisation trials than TD controls, and children with ASD who received non-social feedback or no feedback (in Study 1). Our findings imply that fundamental word learning mechanisms, and the relationships between them, are not qualitatively different in ASD. We argue that ASD may affect the efficiency of these mechanisms by disrupting children’s intake of linguistic input in natural environments, but difficulties may be mitigated by presenting visual and auditory stimuli in a way that appeals to the population’s strengths.

KW - Autism spectrum disorder

KW - Word learning

KW - fast mapping

KW - retention

KW - generalisation

KW - Typical development

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 187

SP - 126

EP - 138

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -