Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Is children’s naming and drawing of pictures me...

Electronic data

  • Full manuscript (accepted)

    Accepted author manuscript, 348 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Is children’s naming and drawing of pictures mediated by representational status?: evidence from typical development and autism.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Is children’s naming and drawing of pictures mediated by representational status? evidence from typical development and autism. / Hartley, Calum; Allen, Melissa.
In: Cognitive Development, Vol. 36, 10.2015, p. 52-67.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{0b2a5568394f49fdbf88c3fad729ea6d,
title = "Is children{\textquoteright}s naming and drawing of pictures mediated by representational status?: evidence from typical development and autism.",
abstract = "Research has debated whether shape or inferred referential intent directs children{\textquoteright}s picture naming. Here we investigate whether typically developing (TD) children aged 2–5 years and children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) comprehend pictures differently depending on whether they are intentional symbols. Participants were shown ambiguous line drawings and were informed that they were either intentional or accidental creations. Children were asked to name and draw each picture. TD children only evidenced a preference for shape-based naming when pictures were intentional representations, and were increasingly likely to create canonical drawings of symbolised referents when stimuli were intentional. Representational intentions did not influence the verbal or drawing responses of children with ASD, however, the nature of their drawings was related to their prior naming. Thus, the meaning that TD children derive from 2-D shapes is mediated by referential intent, while picture comprehension in autism may be comparatively egocentric.",
keywords = "Picture comprehension, Drawing, Understanding intentions, Resemblance, Autism",
author = "Calum Hartley and Melissa Allen",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "52--67",
journal = "Cognitive Development",
issn = "0885-2014",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is children’s naming and drawing of pictures mediated by representational status?

T2 - evidence from typical development and autism.

AU - Hartley, Calum

AU - Allen, Melissa

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Research has debated whether shape or inferred referential intent directs children’s picture naming. Here we investigate whether typically developing (TD) children aged 2–5 years and children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) comprehend pictures differently depending on whether they are intentional symbols. Participants were shown ambiguous line drawings and were informed that they were either intentional or accidental creations. Children were asked to name and draw each picture. TD children only evidenced a preference for shape-based naming when pictures were intentional representations, and were increasingly likely to create canonical drawings of symbolised referents when stimuli were intentional. Representational intentions did not influence the verbal or drawing responses of children with ASD, however, the nature of their drawings was related to their prior naming. Thus, the meaning that TD children derive from 2-D shapes is mediated by referential intent, while picture comprehension in autism may be comparatively egocentric.

AB - Research has debated whether shape or inferred referential intent directs children’s picture naming. Here we investigate whether typically developing (TD) children aged 2–5 years and children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) comprehend pictures differently depending on whether they are intentional symbols. Participants were shown ambiguous line drawings and were informed that they were either intentional or accidental creations. Children were asked to name and draw each picture. TD children only evidenced a preference for shape-based naming when pictures were intentional representations, and were increasingly likely to create canonical drawings of symbolised referents when stimuli were intentional. Representational intentions did not influence the verbal or drawing responses of children with ASD, however, the nature of their drawings was related to their prior naming. Thus, the meaning that TD children derive from 2-D shapes is mediated by referential intent, while picture comprehension in autism may be comparatively egocentric.

KW - Picture comprehension

KW - Drawing

KW - Understanding intentions

KW - Resemblance

KW - Autism

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.08.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 52

EP - 67

JO - Cognitive Development

JF - Cognitive Development

SN - 0885-2014

ER -