Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > King Coal is dead, long live the King!

Electronic data

  • TCS_Coal_Paper_Revised_PURE

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture and Society 31 (5), 2014, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2014 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture and Society page: http://tcs.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 132 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

King Coal is dead, long live the King!: the coal renaissance in the emergence of low carbon societies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>09/2014
<mark>Journal</mark>Theory, Culture and Society
Issue number5
Volume31
Number of pages23
Pages (from-to)59-81
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date8/07/14
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Much discourse on low-carbon transition envisages progressive social change towards environmentally sustainable and more equitable societies. Yet much of this literature pays inadequate attention to the key question of (productive, relational) power. How do energy infrastructures and socio-technical systems interact with, construct, enable and constrain political regimes, and vice versa? Conceiving low-carbon energy transitions through a power lens, the paper explores a case study of huge, but overlooked, significance: the paradox of the ‘phenomenal’ resurgence of coal in an era of low-carbon innovation. Through exposition of the strong connections between coal-based socio-technical systems and a political regime of classical liberalism, illustrated in two eras, we trace an emerging constellation of energy and political regimes connecting ‘clean coal’ with a ‘liberalism 2.0’ centred on a rising China. This affords a critique of the low-carbon society emergent from these developments – a society more reminiscent of coal's previous Dickensian heyday than the progressive visions of much ‘low-carbon transition’ literature.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture and Society 31 (5), 2014, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2014 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Culture and Society page: http://tcs.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/