Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacemen...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship. / Cavaliere, Giulia; Palacios-González, César.
In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 12, 22.11.2018, p. 835-842.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cavaliere G, Palacios-González C. Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2018 Nov 22;44(12):835-842. Epub 2018 Feb 28. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104450

Author

Cavaliere, Giulia ; Palacios-González, César. / Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques : Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 12. pp. 835-842.

Bibtex

@article{f871e40c0a5a41fca0b5399be5adb544,
title = "Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship",
abstract = "In this paper, we argue that lesbian couples who wish to have children who are genetically related to both of them should be allowed access to mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs). First, we provide a brief explanation of mitochondrial diseases and MRTs. We then present the reasons why MRTs are not, by nature, therapeutic. The upshot of the view that MRTs are non-therapeutic techniques is that their therapeutic potential cannot be invoked for restricting their use only to those cases where a mitochondrial DNA disease could be {\textquoteleft}cured{\textquoteright}. We then argue that a positive case for MRTs is justified by an appeal to reproductive freedom, and that the criteria to access these techniques should hence be extended to include lesbian couples who wish to share genetic parenthood. Finally, we consider a potential objection to our argument: that the desire to have genetically related kin is not a morally sufficient reason to allow lesbian couples to access MRTs.",
author = "Giulia Cavaliere and C{\'e}sar Palacios-Gonz{\'a}lez",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2017-104450",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "835--842",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques

T2 - Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship

AU - Cavaliere, Giulia

AU - Palacios-González, César

PY - 2018/11/22

Y1 - 2018/11/22

N2 - In this paper, we argue that lesbian couples who wish to have children who are genetically related to both of them should be allowed access to mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs). First, we provide a brief explanation of mitochondrial diseases and MRTs. We then present the reasons why MRTs are not, by nature, therapeutic. The upshot of the view that MRTs are non-therapeutic techniques is that their therapeutic potential cannot be invoked for restricting their use only to those cases where a mitochondrial DNA disease could be ‘cured’. We then argue that a positive case for MRTs is justified by an appeal to reproductive freedom, and that the criteria to access these techniques should hence be extended to include lesbian couples who wish to share genetic parenthood. Finally, we consider a potential objection to our argument: that the desire to have genetically related kin is not a morally sufficient reason to allow lesbian couples to access MRTs.

AB - In this paper, we argue that lesbian couples who wish to have children who are genetically related to both of them should be allowed access to mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs). First, we provide a brief explanation of mitochondrial diseases and MRTs. We then present the reasons why MRTs are not, by nature, therapeutic. The upshot of the view that MRTs are non-therapeutic techniques is that their therapeutic potential cannot be invoked for restricting their use only to those cases where a mitochondrial DNA disease could be ‘cured’. We then argue that a positive case for MRTs is justified by an appeal to reproductive freedom, and that the criteria to access these techniques should hence be extended to include lesbian couples who wish to share genetic parenthood. Finally, we consider a potential objection to our argument: that the desire to have genetically related kin is not a morally sufficient reason to allow lesbian couples to access MRTs.

UR - http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/29491042

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2017-104450

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2017-104450

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29491042

VL - 44

SP - 835

EP - 842

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 12

ER -