Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Let the Lord the Judge be Judge

Electronic data

  • Law_Culture_Humanities_

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Law, Culture and the Humanities, ? (?), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Law, Culture and the Humanities page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/LCH on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 408 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Let the Lord the Judge be Judge: Hobbes and Locke on Jephthah, Liberalism, Martyrdom

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

E-pub ahead of print
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>16/05/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Law, Culture and the Humanities
Number of pages20
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date16/05/17
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This article offers the first comparative study of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s readings of the Biblical figure of Jephthah the Gileadite and, in particular, the latter’s notorious appeal to God that leads to the killing of his own daughter. To outline its argument, I focus on a critical moment in Hobbes and Locke’s corpuses where they both appeal to Jephthah’s vow to support their theories of sovereign right: Hobbes’ account of the right to punish in Leviathan and Locke’s account of the right to go to war in the “Second Treatise of Government.” If Hobbes and Locke’s readings of Jephthah differ considerably – the one focusing on Jephthah’s daughter, the other on Jephthah himself; the one exploring domestic political theory, the other international relations theory; the one seeking to legitimize the right to punish, the other the right to go to war – I contend that both see Jephthah’s story as an allegory for the origins of sovereign violence in self-sacrifice or even martyrdom. For Hobbes and Locke, Jephthah’s fate becomes a kind of arcane theological paradigm for sovereign killing: what begins as the religious power to die ends up as the political power to kill. In the obscure story of Jephthah the Gileadite, then, I conclude that Hobbes and Locke set in motion what we might call a martyrological machine at the core of the modern liberal state. What if liberalism is constituted less by its professed love of “life” – private interest, private property, self-preservation, self-determination – than a willingness to sacrifice everything and die?

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Law, Culture and the Humanities, ? (?), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Law, Culture and the Humanities page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/LCH on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/