Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Law, Culture and the Humanities, 18 (2), 2022, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2022 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Law, Culture and the Humanities page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/LCH on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 408 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Let the Lord the Judge be Judge
T2 - Hobbes and Locke on Jephthah, Liberalism, Martyrdom
AU - Bradley, Arthur Humphrey
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Law, Culture and the Humanities, 18 (2), 2022, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2022 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Law, Culture and the Humanities page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/LCH on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - This article offers the first comparative study of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s readings of the Biblical figure of Jephthah the Gileadite and, in particular, the latter’s notorious appeal to God that leads to the killing of his own daughter. To outline its argument, I focus on a critical moment in Hobbes and Locke’s corpuses where they both appeal to Jephthah’s vow to support their theories of sovereign right: Hobbes’ account of the right to punish in Leviathan and Locke’s account of the right to go to war in the “Second Treatise of Government.” If Hobbes and Locke’s readings of Jephthah differ considerably – the one focusing on Jephthah’s daughter, the other on Jephthah himself; the one exploring domestic political theory, the other international relations theory; the one seeking to legitimize the right to punish, the other the right to go to war – I contend that both see Jephthah’s story as an allegory for the origins of sovereign violence in self-sacrifice or even martyrdom. For Hobbes and Locke, Jephthah’s fate becomes a kind of arcane theological paradigm for sovereign killing: what begins as the religious power to die ends up as the political power to kill. In the obscure story of Jephthah the Gileadite, then, I conclude that Hobbes and Locke set in motion what we might call a martyrological machine at the core of the modern liberal state. What if liberalism is constituted less by its professed love of “life” – private interest, private property, self-preservation, self-determination – than a willingness to sacrifice everything and die?
AB - This article offers the first comparative study of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s readings of the Biblical figure of Jephthah the Gileadite and, in particular, the latter’s notorious appeal to God that leads to the killing of his own daughter. To outline its argument, I focus on a critical moment in Hobbes and Locke’s corpuses where they both appeal to Jephthah’s vow to support their theories of sovereign right: Hobbes’ account of the right to punish in Leviathan and Locke’s account of the right to go to war in the “Second Treatise of Government.” If Hobbes and Locke’s readings of Jephthah differ considerably – the one focusing on Jephthah’s daughter, the other on Jephthah himself; the one exploring domestic political theory, the other international relations theory; the one seeking to legitimize the right to punish, the other the right to go to war – I contend that both see Jephthah’s story as an allegory for the origins of sovereign violence in self-sacrifice or even martyrdom. For Hobbes and Locke, Jephthah’s fate becomes a kind of arcane theological paradigm for sovereign killing: what begins as the religious power to die ends up as the political power to kill. In the obscure story of Jephthah the Gileadite, then, I conclude that Hobbes and Locke set in motion what we might call a martyrological machine at the core of the modern liberal state. What if liberalism is constituted less by its professed love of “life” – private interest, private property, self-preservation, self-determination – than a willingness to sacrifice everything and die?
KW - Hobbes
KW - Locke
KW - Jephthah
KW - liberalism
KW - martyrdom
U2 - 10.1177/1743872117708352
DO - 10.1177/1743872117708352
M3 - Journal article
VL - 18
SP - 318
EP - 337
JO - Law, Culture and the Humanities
JF - Law, Culture and the Humanities
SN - 1743-8721
IS - 2
ER -