Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective. / Jessop, Bob.
In: Antipode, Vol. 34, No. 3, 06.2002, p. 452-472.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jessop B. Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective. Antipode. 2002 Jun;34(3):452-472. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00250

Author

Bibtex

@article{7e09004869da4772af3cbdcbb8dbf5db,
title = "Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective.",
abstract = "This paper discusses the recurrence and the recurrent limitations of liberalism as a general discourse, strategy, and regime. It then establishes a continuum of neoliberalism ranging from a project for radical system transformation from state socialism to market capitalism, through a basic regime shift within capitalism, to more limited policy adjustments intended to maintain another type of accumulation regime and its mode of regulation. These last two forms of neoliberalism are then related to a broader typology of approaches to the restructuring, rescaling, and reordering of accumulation and regulation in advanced capitalist societies: neoliberalism, neocorporatism, neostatism, and neocommunitarianism. These arguments are illustrated in the final part of the paper through a critique of the World Report on the Urban Future 21 (World Commission 2000), both as an explicit attempt to promote flanking and supporting measures to sustain the neoliberal project on the urban scale and as an implicit attempt to naturalize that project on a global scale.",
keywords = "Liberalism, neo-liberalism, urban governance, state-theoretical perspective",
author = "Bob Jessop",
note = "The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com (c) Blackwell 2002.",
year = "2002",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/1467-8330.00250",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "452--472",
journal = "Antipode",
issn = "0066-4812",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective.

AU - Jessop, Bob

N1 - The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com (c) Blackwell 2002.

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - This paper discusses the recurrence and the recurrent limitations of liberalism as a general discourse, strategy, and regime. It then establishes a continuum of neoliberalism ranging from a project for radical system transformation from state socialism to market capitalism, through a basic regime shift within capitalism, to more limited policy adjustments intended to maintain another type of accumulation regime and its mode of regulation. These last two forms of neoliberalism are then related to a broader typology of approaches to the restructuring, rescaling, and reordering of accumulation and regulation in advanced capitalist societies: neoliberalism, neocorporatism, neostatism, and neocommunitarianism. These arguments are illustrated in the final part of the paper through a critique of the World Report on the Urban Future 21 (World Commission 2000), both as an explicit attempt to promote flanking and supporting measures to sustain the neoliberal project on the urban scale and as an implicit attempt to naturalize that project on a global scale.

AB - This paper discusses the recurrence and the recurrent limitations of liberalism as a general discourse, strategy, and regime. It then establishes a continuum of neoliberalism ranging from a project for radical system transformation from state socialism to market capitalism, through a basic regime shift within capitalism, to more limited policy adjustments intended to maintain another type of accumulation regime and its mode of regulation. These last two forms of neoliberalism are then related to a broader typology of approaches to the restructuring, rescaling, and reordering of accumulation and regulation in advanced capitalist societies: neoliberalism, neocorporatism, neostatism, and neocommunitarianism. These arguments are illustrated in the final part of the paper through a critique of the World Report on the Urban Future 21 (World Commission 2000), both as an explicit attempt to promote flanking and supporting measures to sustain the neoliberal project on the urban scale and as an implicit attempt to naturalize that project on a global scale.

KW - Liberalism

KW - neo-liberalism

KW - urban governance

KW - state-theoretical perspective

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8330.00250

DO - 10.1111/1467-8330.00250

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 452

EP - 472

JO - Antipode

JF - Antipode

SN - 0066-4812

IS - 3

ER -