12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > London’s Legal Elite
View graph of relations

« Back

London’s Legal Elite: recruitment through cultural capital and the reproduction of social exclusivity in City professional service fields

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date2012
JournalEnvironment and Planning A: Environment and Planning
Journal number7
Volume44
Number of pages19
Pages1744-1762
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which recruitment and selection processes facilitate the reproduction of elites and elite cultures within City law firms. The research is based upon original research carried out during 2009 consisting of in-depth semi-structured interviews, semiotic and content analyses of recruitment materials and websites, and the analysis of publicly available data demonstrating the educational backgrounds of lawyers practising in the City. By deploying Bourdieusian concepts including the field, doxa, cultural capital and habitus the paper shows that in the firms studied homologous elite cultures and social groups are maintained and legitimated as part of attempts to reproduce ‘normalised’ expectations about the identity and practice of a City professional. Maintenance is ensured by assessing the objectified, institutionalised and embodied cultural capital of applicants in recruitment and selection processes, with only those possessing certain types of capital being recruited. This selection by cultural capital limits social mobility in City professions which are dominated by the upper-middle classes and helps explain why, in the face of critique and in the context of programs designed to widen social diversity, the City legal profession remains socially exclusive.

Bibliographic note

Cook, Faulconbridge, Muzio, 2012. The definitive, peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and PLanning A, 44 (7), 1744-1762, 2012 10.1068/a43605