Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making human better and making better humans.

Electronic data

Links

View graph of relations

Making human better and making better humans.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Making human better and making better humans. / Levitt, Mairi; O'Neill, Fiona K.
In: Genomics, Society and Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2010, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Levitt, M & O'Neill, FK 2010, 'Making human better and making better humans.', Genomics, Society and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-15. <http://www.gspjournal.com/>

APA

Levitt, M., & O'Neill, F. K. (2010). Making human better and making better humans. Genomics, Society and Policy, 6(1), 1-15. http://www.gspjournal.com/

Vancouver

Levitt M, O'Neill FK. Making human better and making better humans. Genomics, Society and Policy. 2010;6(1):1-15.

Author

Levitt, Mairi ; O'Neill, Fiona K. / Making human better and making better humans. In: Genomics, Society and Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 1-15.

Bibtex

@article{0b4c881116fd42fd9671aa4713f026b8,
title = "Making human better and making better humans.",
abstract = "The last 10 years has seen the development and deployment of new biotechnologies not just as potential treatments but also as potential enhancements. The definition and differentiation of treatment (therapy) from enhancement is an ongoing clinical, ethical and social debate that ranges across a proliferating number of convergent technologies. Many of these innovations will {\textquoteleft}come-on-line{\textquoteright} as present generations of young people will be reaching adulthood and considering parenthood. This paper reports on a project that explored the possibilities for human enhancement with young people in order to gather their attitudes towards enhancement and the types of arguments/reasoning they employ when thinking about the possibilities and the techniques. The project focused on if/how distinctions are made between treatment and enhancement, between the different techniques that might be used for enhancement (genetic and non-genetic) and perceptions of risks and benefits. The young people{\textquoteright}s viewpoints, their methods of reasoning and underlying values are compared with those of bioethicists writing on the topic.",
keywords = "Human enhancement Bioethics Young people",
author = "Mairi Levitt and O'Neill, {Fiona K.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Genomics, Society and Policy",
issn = "1746-5354",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making human better and making better humans.

AU - Levitt, Mairi

AU - O'Neill, Fiona K.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The last 10 years has seen the development and deployment of new biotechnologies not just as potential treatments but also as potential enhancements. The definition and differentiation of treatment (therapy) from enhancement is an ongoing clinical, ethical and social debate that ranges across a proliferating number of convergent technologies. Many of these innovations will ‘come-on-line’ as present generations of young people will be reaching adulthood and considering parenthood. This paper reports on a project that explored the possibilities for human enhancement with young people in order to gather their attitudes towards enhancement and the types of arguments/reasoning they employ when thinking about the possibilities and the techniques. The project focused on if/how distinctions are made between treatment and enhancement, between the different techniques that might be used for enhancement (genetic and non-genetic) and perceptions of risks and benefits. The young people’s viewpoints, their methods of reasoning and underlying values are compared with those of bioethicists writing on the topic.

AB - The last 10 years has seen the development and deployment of new biotechnologies not just as potential treatments but also as potential enhancements. The definition and differentiation of treatment (therapy) from enhancement is an ongoing clinical, ethical and social debate that ranges across a proliferating number of convergent technologies. Many of these innovations will ‘come-on-line’ as present generations of young people will be reaching adulthood and considering parenthood. This paper reports on a project that explored the possibilities for human enhancement with young people in order to gather their attitudes towards enhancement and the types of arguments/reasoning they employ when thinking about the possibilities and the techniques. The project focused on if/how distinctions are made between treatment and enhancement, between the different techniques that might be used for enhancement (genetic and non-genetic) and perceptions of risks and benefits. The young people’s viewpoints, their methods of reasoning and underlying values are compared with those of bioethicists writing on the topic.

KW - Human enhancement Bioethics Young people

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Genomics, Society and Policy

JF - Genomics, Society and Policy

SN - 1746-5354

IS - 1

ER -