Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Making links: how different types of connective...
View graph of relations

Making links: how different types of connective influence memory and representation of meaning

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Poster

Published

Standard

Making links: how different types of connective influence memory and representation of meaning. / Pooley, Nicola; Nash, Hannah; Cain, Kate.
2008. Poster session presented at 2008 British Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Poster

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Pooley N, Nash H, Cain K. Making links: how different types of connective influence memory and representation of meaning. 2008. Poster session presented at 2008 British Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Author

Pooley, Nicola ; Nash, Hannah ; Cain, Kate. / Making links: how different types of connective influence memory and representation of meaning. Poster session presented at 2008 British Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Bibtex

@conference{89db49b5a26641b2884cb6c7a4db1cc7,
title = "Making links: how different types of connective influence memory and representation of meaning",
abstract = "Interclausal connectives such as {\textquoteleft}before,{\textquoteright} {\textquoteleft}although,{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}because{\textquoteright} play an important role in reading: they signal the relations between segments of text and indicate how to integrate clauses and sentences. We report two experiments (cued and free recall) to investigate whether different types of connective (temporal, causal, adversative) aid 7-8 and 9-10 year-olds{\textquoteright} memory for sentences and affect how they represent sentence meaning. For both age groups, memory for sentences was improved when the clauses were connected by a meaningful connective that explicitly signalled the relation between them. The type of connective influenced how meaning was represented. Clearly, young readers can take advantage of the linguistic and pragmatic function of these cohesive devices. ",
author = "Nicola Pooley and Hannah Nash and Kate Cain",
year = "2008",
month = sep,
language = "English",
note = "2008 British Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference ; Conference date: 01-09-2008 Through 03-09-2008",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Making links: how different types of connective influence memory and representation of meaning

AU - Pooley, Nicola

AU - Nash, Hannah

AU - Cain, Kate

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Interclausal connectives such as ‘before,’ ‘although,’ and ‘because’ play an important role in reading: they signal the relations between segments of text and indicate how to integrate clauses and sentences. We report two experiments (cued and free recall) to investigate whether different types of connective (temporal, causal, adversative) aid 7-8 and 9-10 year-olds’ memory for sentences and affect how they represent sentence meaning. For both age groups, memory for sentences was improved when the clauses were connected by a meaningful connective that explicitly signalled the relation between them. The type of connective influenced how meaning was represented. Clearly, young readers can take advantage of the linguistic and pragmatic function of these cohesive devices.

AB - Interclausal connectives such as ‘before,’ ‘although,’ and ‘because’ play an important role in reading: they signal the relations between segments of text and indicate how to integrate clauses and sentences. We report two experiments (cued and free recall) to investigate whether different types of connective (temporal, causal, adversative) aid 7-8 and 9-10 year-olds’ memory for sentences and affect how they represent sentence meaning. For both age groups, memory for sentences was improved when the clauses were connected by a meaningful connective that explicitly signalled the relation between them. The type of connective influenced how meaning was represented. Clearly, young readers can take advantage of the linguistic and pragmatic function of these cohesive devices.

M3 - Poster

T2 - 2008 British Psychological Society Developmental Section Annual Conference

Y2 - 1 September 2008 through 3 September 2008

ER -