Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Matching resources to care

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1). / Huxley, Peter; Reilly, Siobhan; Gater, R. et al.
In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 35, No. 7, 07.2000, p. 312-317.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Huxley, P, Reilly, S, Gater, R, Robinshaw, E, Harrison, J, Mohamad, H, Butler, T & Windle, B 2000, 'Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1)', Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001270050244

APA

Huxley, P., Reilly, S., Gater, R., Robinshaw, E., Harrison, J., Mohamad, H., Butler, T., & Windle, B. (2000). Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 35(7), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001270050244

Vancouver

Huxley P, Reilly S, Gater R, Robinshaw E, Harrison J, Mohamad H et al. Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2000 Jul;35(7):312-317. doi: 10.1007/s001270050244

Author

Huxley, Peter ; Reilly, Siobhan ; Gater, R. et al. / Matching resources to care : the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1). In: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2000 ; Vol. 35, No. 7. pp. 312-317.

Bibtex

@article{6d497118334e443ebb208632ee3d405b,
title = "Matching resources to care: the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1)",
abstract = "Most definitions of severe mental illness (SMI) are categorical and assign the patient to either SMI or not-SMI status. While this is useful for some purposes, it is a rather limited approach. The purpose of the present study is to develop a new method of addressing the issue of 'severity', and to develop a dimensional rather than a categorical approach. The paper reports on the acceptability, reliability and validity of a method developed to collect a standard set of data covering the majority of items specified in the academic and policy literature as characterising SMI.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Great Britain, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Pilot Projects, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index",
author = "Peter Huxley and Siobhan Reilly and R. Gater and Eva Robinshaw and J. Harrison and Hadi Mohamad and T. Butler and Barry Windle",
year = "2000",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1007/s001270050244",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "312--317",
journal = "Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology",
issn = "0933-7954",
publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Matching resources to care

T2 - the acceptability, validity and inter-rater reliability of a new instrument to assess severe mental illness (MARC-1)

AU - Huxley, Peter

AU - Reilly, Siobhan

AU - Gater, R.

AU - Robinshaw, Eva

AU - Harrison, J.

AU - Mohamad, Hadi

AU - Butler, T.

AU - Windle, Barry

PY - 2000/7

Y1 - 2000/7

N2 - Most definitions of severe mental illness (SMI) are categorical and assign the patient to either SMI or not-SMI status. While this is useful for some purposes, it is a rather limited approach. The purpose of the present study is to develop a new method of addressing the issue of 'severity', and to develop a dimensional rather than a categorical approach. The paper reports on the acceptability, reliability and validity of a method developed to collect a standard set of data covering the majority of items specified in the academic and policy literature as characterising SMI.

AB - Most definitions of severe mental illness (SMI) are categorical and assign the patient to either SMI or not-SMI status. While this is useful for some purposes, it is a rather limited approach. The purpose of the present study is to develop a new method of addressing the issue of 'severity', and to develop a dimensional rather than a categorical approach. The paper reports on the acceptability, reliability and validity of a method developed to collect a standard set of data covering the majority of items specified in the academic and policy literature as characterising SMI.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Great Britain

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Mental Disorders

KW - Mental Health Services

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Severity of Illness Index

U2 - 10.1007/s001270050244

DO - 10.1007/s001270050244

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 11016526

VL - 35

SP - 312

EP - 317

JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

SN - 0933-7954

IS - 7

ER -