Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Measuring organizational performance: towards m...
View graph of relations

Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. / Richard, P J; Devinney, T; Yip, G et al.
In: Journal of Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2009, p. 718-804.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Richard, PJ, Devinney, T, Yip, G & Johnson, G 2009, 'Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice', Journal of Management, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 718-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560

APA

Richard, P. J., Devinney, T., Yip, G., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560

Vancouver

Richard PJ, Devinney T, Yip G, Johnson G. Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management. 2009;35(3):718-804. doi: 10.1177/0149206308330560

Author

Richard, P J ; Devinney, T ; Yip, G et al. / Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. In: Journal of Management. 2009 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 718-804.

Bibtex

@article{d5cd2294253847978544384cd9621992,
title = "Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice",
abstract = "Organizational performance is one of the most important constructs in management research. Reviewing past studies reveals a multidimensional conceptualization of organizational performance related predominately to stakeholders, heterogeneous product market circumstances, and time. A review of the operationalization of performance highlights the limited effectiveness of commonly accepted measurement practices in tapping this multidimensionality. Addressing these findings requires researchers to (a) possess a strong theoretical rationale on the nature of performance (i.e., theory establishing which measures are appropriate to the research context) and (b) rely on strong theory as to the nature of measures (i.e., theory establishing which measures should be combined and the method for doing so). All management research on performance should explicitly address these two requirements. The authors conclude with a call for research that examines triangulation using multiple measures, longitudinal data and alternative methodological formulations as methods of appropriately aligning research contexts with the measurement of organizational performance. ",
author = "Richard, {P J} and T Devinney and G Yip and G Johnson",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/0149206308330560",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "718--804",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice

AU - Richard, P J

AU - Devinney, T

AU - Yip, G

AU - Johnson, G

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Organizational performance is one of the most important constructs in management research. Reviewing past studies reveals a multidimensional conceptualization of organizational performance related predominately to stakeholders, heterogeneous product market circumstances, and time. A review of the operationalization of performance highlights the limited effectiveness of commonly accepted measurement practices in tapping this multidimensionality. Addressing these findings requires researchers to (a) possess a strong theoretical rationale on the nature of performance (i.e., theory establishing which measures are appropriate to the research context) and (b) rely on strong theory as to the nature of measures (i.e., theory establishing which measures should be combined and the method for doing so). All management research on performance should explicitly address these two requirements. The authors conclude with a call for research that examines triangulation using multiple measures, longitudinal data and alternative methodological formulations as methods of appropriately aligning research contexts with the measurement of organizational performance.

AB - Organizational performance is one of the most important constructs in management research. Reviewing past studies reveals a multidimensional conceptualization of organizational performance related predominately to stakeholders, heterogeneous product market circumstances, and time. A review of the operationalization of performance highlights the limited effectiveness of commonly accepted measurement practices in tapping this multidimensionality. Addressing these findings requires researchers to (a) possess a strong theoretical rationale on the nature of performance (i.e., theory establishing which measures are appropriate to the research context) and (b) rely on strong theory as to the nature of measures (i.e., theory establishing which measures should be combined and the method for doing so). All management research on performance should explicitly address these two requirements. The authors conclude with a call for research that examines triangulation using multiple measures, longitudinal data and alternative methodological formulations as methods of appropriately aligning research contexts with the measurement of organizational performance.

U2 - 10.1177/0149206308330560

DO - 10.1177/0149206308330560

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 718

EP - 804

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 3

ER -