Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse
View graph of relations

Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse. / Demjen, Zsofia; Semino, Elena.
The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies. ed. / Anna De Fina; Alexandra Georgakopoulou. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 213-234 (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Demjen, Z & Semino, E 2020, Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse. in A De Fina & A Georgakopoulou (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.011

APA

Demjen, Z., & Semino, E. (2020). Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse. In A. De Fina, & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 213-234). (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.011

Vancouver

Demjen Z, Semino E. Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse. In De Fina A, Georgakopoulou A, editors, The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2020. p. 213-234. (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). doi: 10.1017/9781108348195.011

Author

Demjen, Zsofia ; Semino, Elena. / Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies. editor / Anna De Fina ; Alexandra Georgakopoulou. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2020. pp. 213-234 (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics).

Bibtex

@inbook{14bb3d1b71124af8be621540a3f83439,
title = "Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse",
abstract = "Metaphor involves the perception of similarities or correspondences between unlike entities and processes, so that one can experience, think and communicate about one thing in terms of another – lives as journeys, minds as machines, emotions as external forces, and so on. A consistent thread in the history of the study of metaphor concerns the potential of different metaphor choices to reflect and facilitate different ways of viewing topics or phenomena – a function of metaphor that is itself metaphorically captured by the notion of “framing.” The related phenomenon of metonymy, although less well studied in these terms, also facilitates framing in discourse. In this chapter, we review research on the framing power of metaphor and metonymy, with a particular focus on studies that are relevant to or directly concerned with the use of metaphor in discourse, broadly conceived. We begin with an overview of rhetorical approaches to metaphor as a tool for persuasion and of cognitive approaches to metaphor as a tool for thinking, including both theoretical and empirical studies. We review a variety of studies that have investigated the framing function of metaphor, and, to a lesser extent, metonymy, in authentic language use from a range of sources (e.g. politics, science and education) and using different qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Focusing on metaphor, where the evidence is most robust, we critically examine the relationship between, broadly speaking, cognitive and discourse-based approaches to metaphor. We go on to provide a concrete example of the framing function of metaphor in healthcare discourse, and show how cognitive and discourse perspectives can be usefully combined into a multilevel analytical framework that can, among other things, be used to make recommendations for professional practice and training.",
author = "Zsofia Demjen and Elena Semino",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781108348195.011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781108425148",
series = "Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
pages = "213--234",
editor = "{De Fina}, Anna and Alexandra Georgakopoulou",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse

AU - Demjen, Zsofia

AU - Semino, Elena

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - Metaphor involves the perception of similarities or correspondences between unlike entities and processes, so that one can experience, think and communicate about one thing in terms of another – lives as journeys, minds as machines, emotions as external forces, and so on. A consistent thread in the history of the study of metaphor concerns the potential of different metaphor choices to reflect and facilitate different ways of viewing topics or phenomena – a function of metaphor that is itself metaphorically captured by the notion of “framing.” The related phenomenon of metonymy, although less well studied in these terms, also facilitates framing in discourse. In this chapter, we review research on the framing power of metaphor and metonymy, with a particular focus on studies that are relevant to or directly concerned with the use of metaphor in discourse, broadly conceived. We begin with an overview of rhetorical approaches to metaphor as a tool for persuasion and of cognitive approaches to metaphor as a tool for thinking, including both theoretical and empirical studies. We review a variety of studies that have investigated the framing function of metaphor, and, to a lesser extent, metonymy, in authentic language use from a range of sources (e.g. politics, science and education) and using different qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Focusing on metaphor, where the evidence is most robust, we critically examine the relationship between, broadly speaking, cognitive and discourse-based approaches to metaphor. We go on to provide a concrete example of the framing function of metaphor in healthcare discourse, and show how cognitive and discourse perspectives can be usefully combined into a multilevel analytical framework that can, among other things, be used to make recommendations for professional practice and training.

AB - Metaphor involves the perception of similarities or correspondences between unlike entities and processes, so that one can experience, think and communicate about one thing in terms of another – lives as journeys, minds as machines, emotions as external forces, and so on. A consistent thread in the history of the study of metaphor concerns the potential of different metaphor choices to reflect and facilitate different ways of viewing topics or phenomena – a function of metaphor that is itself metaphorically captured by the notion of “framing.” The related phenomenon of metonymy, although less well studied in these terms, also facilitates framing in discourse. In this chapter, we review research on the framing power of metaphor and metonymy, with a particular focus on studies that are relevant to or directly concerned with the use of metaphor in discourse, broadly conceived. We begin with an overview of rhetorical approaches to metaphor as a tool for persuasion and of cognitive approaches to metaphor as a tool for thinking, including both theoretical and empirical studies. We review a variety of studies that have investigated the framing function of metaphor, and, to a lesser extent, metonymy, in authentic language use from a range of sources (e.g. politics, science and education) and using different qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Focusing on metaphor, where the evidence is most robust, we critically examine the relationship between, broadly speaking, cognitive and discourse-based approaches to metaphor. We go on to provide a concrete example of the framing function of metaphor in healthcare discourse, and show how cognitive and discourse perspectives can be usefully combined into a multilevel analytical framework that can, among other things, be used to make recommendations for professional practice and training.

U2 - 10.1017/9781108348195.011

DO - 10.1017/9781108348195.011

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781108425148

T3 - Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics

SP - 213

EP - 234

BT - The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies

A2 - De Fina, Anna

A2 - Georgakopoulou, Alexandra

PB - Cambridge University Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -