Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Methodological Issues in Cross-Linguistic and M...

Electronic data

  • Linguistic issues in advertising research - plain text

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Advertising on 25/01/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00913367.2016.1180656

    Accepted author manuscript, 451 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Methodological Issues in Cross-Linguistic and Multilingual Advertising Research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>25/01/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Advertising
Issue number1
Volume46
Number of pages14
Pages (from-to)115-128
Publication statusPublished
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This article discusses methodological issues related to language in advertising research. We introduce a framework that distinguishes between cross-linguistic research settings, where several languages are used in the study and different samples of respondents are studied in their own language, and multilingual research settings, where only a single language is used and multilingual respondents are studied either in their native or nonnative language. We review key principles that govern cross-linguistic and multilingual effects in advertising research to formulate guidelines for research design and data analysis. In the cross-linguistic context, these principles address nonuniform cross-linguistic differences in responses (related to nonequivalence of individual questionnaire items) versus uniform response effects (related to nonequivalence of verbal response category labels). In the multilingual context, we bring together evidence that shows how—even when comprehension is not a problem—stimuli, questions, and response categories may be processed differently in respondents' native versus nonnative language.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Advertising on 25/01/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00913367.2016.1180656