Rights statement: This is a post-print of an article published in Journal of Management Studies, 51 (2), 2014. (c) Wiley.
Accepted author manuscript, 478 KB, PDF document
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings
AU - Kwon, Winston
AU - Clarke, Ian
AU - Wodak, Ruth
N1 - This is a post-print of an article published in Journal of Management Studies, 51 (2), 2014. (c) Wiley.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Management scholars have explored how certain actors in meetings – especially leaders – shape social processes of interaction and use different linguistic devices, as methods, to affect how sense is made of strategic issues. Less attention has been paid to interactions between members of the team as a whole and the repertoire of discursive strategies, or goal-directed behaviours, that they deploy to create shared views around issues. We analyse rare empirical episodes of team discussions of strategic issues in board meetings to inductively conceptualize how this is achieved. To do this we use the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) to critical discourse analysis (CDA). We reveal five discursive strategies teams use to develop shared views around strategic issues (Re/defining, Equalizing, Simplifying, Legitimating, and Reconciling) and demonstrate how they are skilfully operationalized through a range of linguistic devices or means.
AB - Management scholars have explored how certain actors in meetings – especially leaders – shape social processes of interaction and use different linguistic devices, as methods, to affect how sense is made of strategic issues. Less attention has been paid to interactions between members of the team as a whole and the repertoire of discursive strategies, or goal-directed behaviours, that they deploy to create shared views around issues. We analyse rare empirical episodes of team discussions of strategic issues in board meetings to inductively conceptualize how this is achieved. To do this we use the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) to critical discourse analysis (CDA). We reveal five discursive strategies teams use to develop shared views around strategic issues (Re/defining, Equalizing, Simplifying, Legitimating, and Reconciling) and demonstrate how they are skilfully operationalized through a range of linguistic devices or means.
KW - Critical Discourse Analysis
KW - Discourse-Historical Approach
KW - discursive strategies
KW - linguistic devices
KW - meetings
KW - shared views
KW - strategic issues
U2 - 10.1111/joms.12036
DO - 10.1111/joms.12036
M3 - Journal article
VL - 51
SP - 265
EP - 290
JO - Journal of Management Studies
JF - Journal of Management Studies
SN - 0022-2380
IS - 2
ER -