12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Model Predictions of Metal Speciation in Freshw...
View graph of relations

« Back

Model Predictions of Metal Speciation in Freshwaters Compared to Measurements by In Situ Techniques

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

  • Emily R. Unsworth
  • Kent W. Warnken
  • Frank Black
  • Jacques Buffle
  • Jun Cao
  • Rob Cleven
  • Josep Galceran
  • Peggy Gunkel
  • Erwin Kalis
  • David Kistler
  • Herman P. Van Leeuwen
  • Michel Martin
  • Stéphane Noël
  • Yusuf Nur
  • Niksa Odzak
  • Jaume Puy
  • Willem Van Riemsdijk
  • Laura Sigg
  • Erwin Temminghoff
  • Mary-Lou Tercier-Waeber
  • Stefanie Toepperwien
  • Raewin M. Town
  • Liping Weng
  • Hanbin Xue
Journal publication date15/03/2006
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Journal number6
Volume40
Number of pages8
Pages1942-1949
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Measurements of trace metal species in situ in a softwater river, a hardwater lake, and a hardwater stream were compared to the equilibrium distribution of species calculated using two models, WHAM 6, incorporating humic ion binding model VI and visual MINTEQ incorporating NICA-Donnan. Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and voltammetry at a gel integrated microelectrode (GIME) were used to estimate dynamic species that are both labile and mobile. The Donnan membrane technique (DMT) and hollow fiber permeation liquid membrane (HFPLM) were used to measure free ion activities. Predictions of dominant metal species using the two models agreed reasonably well, even when colloidal oxide components were considered. Concentrations derived using GIME were generally lower than those from DGT, consistent with calculations of the lability criteria that take into account the smaller time window available for the flux to GIME. Model predictions of free ion activities generally did not agree with measurements, highlighting the need for further work and difficulties in obtaining appropriate input data.