Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Modeling and interpreting element ratios in wat...

Electronic data

Links

View graph of relations

Modeling and interpreting element ratios in water and sediments: A sensitivity analysis of post-Chernobyl Ru : Cs ratios.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Published

Standard

Modeling and interpreting element ratios in water and sediments: A sensitivity analysis of post-Chernobyl Ru : Cs ratios. / Hilton, J.; Rigg, E.; Davison, W. et al.
In: Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 40, No. 7, 1995, p. 1302-1309.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Hilton, J. ; Rigg, E. ; Davison, W. et al. / Modeling and interpreting element ratios in water and sediments: A sensitivity analysis of post-Chernobyl Ru : Cs ratios. In: Limnology and Oceanography. 1995 ; Vol. 40, No. 7. pp. 1302-1309.

Bibtex

@article{6d55bef5e9ee4cf78c96ef599489bcdc,
title = "Modeling and interpreting element ratios in water and sediments: A sensitivity analysis of post-Chernobyl Ru : Cs ratios.",
abstract = "When elements are simultaneously added to lakes, experimentally or by accident, their ratios in the water phase and in bottom sediments can change with time due to differential partitioning between solution and suspended particles or sediments. A number of equations are developed to show the change of ratio with time in water and sediments assuming simultaneous pulse inputs followed by a range of combinations of loss processes from solution (i.e. hydraulic losses, sorption to particles followed by settling, and diffusion into the sediments). The pattern of events is discussed both for pulse events with specific limiting assumptions and for combined continuous and pulse inputs. The models show that elemental ratios in sediments are generally less sensitive indicators of differential partitioning than are elemental ratios in water. For lakes with long residence times, the long-term elemental ratio in the sediments does not differ from that in the initial spike to the water column, but for short residence times, it is directly dependent on the ratio of either partition or diffusion coefficients. The models are used to interpret Ru : Cs ratios measured in the water and sediments of Esthwaite Water subsequent to the pulse input of Chernobyl fallout. The ratios can be explained by assuming nuclides were lost either by flushing and sorption or by flushing, sorption, and diffusion. The process combination of flushing and diffusion is incompatible with the observed constant ratios.",
author = "J. Hilton and E. Rigg and W. Davison and J. Hamilton-Taylor and M. Kelly and Livens, {F. R.} and Singleton, {D. L.}",
note = "Copyright, 2002 by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1302--1309",
journal = "Limnology and Oceanography",
publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling and interpreting element ratios in water and sediments: A sensitivity analysis of post-Chernobyl Ru : Cs ratios.

AU - Hilton, J.

AU - Rigg, E.

AU - Davison, W.

AU - Hamilton-Taylor, J.

AU - Kelly, M.

AU - Livens, F. R.

AU - Singleton, D. L.

N1 - Copyright, 2002 by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - When elements are simultaneously added to lakes, experimentally or by accident, their ratios in the water phase and in bottom sediments can change with time due to differential partitioning between solution and suspended particles or sediments. A number of equations are developed to show the change of ratio with time in water and sediments assuming simultaneous pulse inputs followed by a range of combinations of loss processes from solution (i.e. hydraulic losses, sorption to particles followed by settling, and diffusion into the sediments). The pattern of events is discussed both for pulse events with specific limiting assumptions and for combined continuous and pulse inputs. The models show that elemental ratios in sediments are generally less sensitive indicators of differential partitioning than are elemental ratios in water. For lakes with long residence times, the long-term elemental ratio in the sediments does not differ from that in the initial spike to the water column, but for short residence times, it is directly dependent on the ratio of either partition or diffusion coefficients. The models are used to interpret Ru : Cs ratios measured in the water and sediments of Esthwaite Water subsequent to the pulse input of Chernobyl fallout. The ratios can be explained by assuming nuclides were lost either by flushing and sorption or by flushing, sorption, and diffusion. The process combination of flushing and diffusion is incompatible with the observed constant ratios.

AB - When elements are simultaneously added to lakes, experimentally or by accident, their ratios in the water phase and in bottom sediments can change with time due to differential partitioning between solution and suspended particles or sediments. A number of equations are developed to show the change of ratio with time in water and sediments assuming simultaneous pulse inputs followed by a range of combinations of loss processes from solution (i.e. hydraulic losses, sorption to particles followed by settling, and diffusion into the sediments). The pattern of events is discussed both for pulse events with specific limiting assumptions and for combined continuous and pulse inputs. The models show that elemental ratios in sediments are generally less sensitive indicators of differential partitioning than are elemental ratios in water. For lakes with long residence times, the long-term elemental ratio in the sediments does not differ from that in the initial spike to the water column, but for short residence times, it is directly dependent on the ratio of either partition or diffusion coefficients. The models are used to interpret Ru : Cs ratios measured in the water and sediments of Esthwaite Water subsequent to the pulse input of Chernobyl fallout. The ratios can be explained by assuming nuclides were lost either by flushing and sorption or by flushing, sorption, and diffusion. The process combination of flushing and diffusion is incompatible with the observed constant ratios.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 1302

EP - 1309

JO - Limnology and Oceanography

JF - Limnology and Oceanography

IS - 7

ER -