Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Modeling spatial processes with unknown extrema...

Electronic data

  • Spatial_2017_revised

    Accepted author manuscript, 636 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class. / Huser, Raphael; Wadsworth, Jennifer Lynne.
In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 114, No. 525, 01.02.2019, p. 434-444.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Huser, R & Wadsworth, JL 2019, 'Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class', Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 114, no. 525, pp. 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1411813

APA

Huser, R., & Wadsworth, J. L. (2019). Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114(525), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1411813

Vancouver

Huser R, Wadsworth JL. Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2019 Feb 1;114(525):434-444. Epub 2018 Jun 28. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1411813

Author

Huser, Raphael ; Wadsworth, Jennifer Lynne. / Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2019 ; Vol. 114, No. 525. pp. 434-444.

Bibtex

@article{6ce8746b33164493b0a98b7aabed96d7,
title = "Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class",
abstract = "Many environmental processes exhibit weakening spatial dependence as events become more extreme. Well-known limiting models, such as max-stable or generalized Pareto processes, cannot capture this, which can lead to a preference for models that exhibit a property known as asymptotic independence. However, weakening dependence does not automatically imply asymptotic independence, and whether the process is truly asymptotically (in)dependent is usually far from clear. The distinction is key as it can have a large impact upon extrapolation, that is, the estimated probabilities of events more extreme than those observed. In this work, we present a single spatial model that is able to capture both dependence classes in a parsimonious manner, and with a smooth transition between the two cases. The model covers a wide range of possibilities from asymptotic independence through to complete dependence, and permits weakening dependence of extremes even under asymptotic dependence. Censored likelihood-based inference for the implied copula is feasible in moderate dimensions due to closed-form margins. The model is applied to oceanographic datasets with ambiguous true limiting dependence structure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.",
author = "Raphael Huser and Wadsworth, {Jennifer Lynne}",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01621459.2017.1411813",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "434--444",
journal = "Journal of the American Statistical Association",
issn = "0162-1459",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "525",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling spatial processes with unknown extremal dependence class

AU - Huser, Raphael

AU - Wadsworth, Jennifer Lynne

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Many environmental processes exhibit weakening spatial dependence as events become more extreme. Well-known limiting models, such as max-stable or generalized Pareto processes, cannot capture this, which can lead to a preference for models that exhibit a property known as asymptotic independence. However, weakening dependence does not automatically imply asymptotic independence, and whether the process is truly asymptotically (in)dependent is usually far from clear. The distinction is key as it can have a large impact upon extrapolation, that is, the estimated probabilities of events more extreme than those observed. In this work, we present a single spatial model that is able to capture both dependence classes in a parsimonious manner, and with a smooth transition between the two cases. The model covers a wide range of possibilities from asymptotic independence through to complete dependence, and permits weakening dependence of extremes even under asymptotic dependence. Censored likelihood-based inference for the implied copula is feasible in moderate dimensions due to closed-form margins. The model is applied to oceanographic datasets with ambiguous true limiting dependence structure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

AB - Many environmental processes exhibit weakening spatial dependence as events become more extreme. Well-known limiting models, such as max-stable or generalized Pareto processes, cannot capture this, which can lead to a preference for models that exhibit a property known as asymptotic independence. However, weakening dependence does not automatically imply asymptotic independence, and whether the process is truly asymptotically (in)dependent is usually far from clear. The distinction is key as it can have a large impact upon extrapolation, that is, the estimated probabilities of events more extreme than those observed. In this work, we present a single spatial model that is able to capture both dependence classes in a parsimonious manner, and with a smooth transition between the two cases. The model covers a wide range of possibilities from asymptotic independence through to complete dependence, and permits weakening dependence of extremes even under asymptotic dependence. Censored likelihood-based inference for the implied copula is feasible in moderate dimensions due to closed-form margins. The model is applied to oceanographic datasets with ambiguous true limiting dependence structure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

U2 - 10.1080/01621459.2017.1411813

DO - 10.1080/01621459.2017.1411813

M3 - Journal article

VL - 114

SP - 434

EP - 444

JO - Journal of the American Statistical Association

JF - Journal of the American Statistical Association

SN - 0162-1459

IS - 525

ER -