Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five St...

Electronic data

  • 11003501.pdf

    Final published version, 20.3 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND

View graph of relations

Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Unpublished

Standard

Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process. / Robinson, Heather Amy.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2013. 387 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

Robinson, HA 2013, 'Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process.', PhD, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

APA

Robinson, H. A. (2013). Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University.

Vancouver

Robinson HA. Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process.. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2013. 387 p.

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{23ba5319c5c94f19a776faefd501407d,
title = "Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process.",
abstract = "The clinical effectiveness of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder (BD) may be enhanced by having a coherent psychological model of BD, which amalgamates many of the concepts proposed in the existing psychological models of BD and some which are not. This PhD aimed to expand on the Self Regulation Model (SRM; Leventhal et al. , 1984) framework to enhance understanding of mood identification and regulation in BD. The mood management model proposed was tested using three methodologies (namely experience sampling, mood induction and a cross-sectional survey design) to provide insight into mood management processes in daily life, following controlled mood manipulation and in response to self-report questionnaires in a large sample of people with BD from across the North West of England and Nottingham. Demonstrating differences between euthymic bipolar participants and healthy controls regarding the psychological processes that underlie the self-regulation of mood may inform psychological interventions. Compared to healthy controls, people with BD reported more variability in mood, perceived more positive consequences, less personal control, less understanding, a shorter duration of mood and made more internal attributions for hypomanic and depressive experiences. Furthermore, while people with BD reported implementing helpful coping strategies (CS) to manage low mood, the most commonly used CS for mania were related to stimulating behaviours that would likely escalate mood and were rated as unhelpful by participants themselves. The current results support the application of the SRM to BD and the importance of expanding this model to explain mood management in BD. The clinical implications, limitations and avenues for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "MiAaPQ, Behavioral psychology., Clinical psychology.",
author = "Robinson, {Heather Amy}",
note = "Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2013.",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Mood Management in Bipolar Disorder : A Five Stage Process.

AU - Robinson, Heather Amy

N1 - Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2013.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The clinical effectiveness of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder (BD) may be enhanced by having a coherent psychological model of BD, which amalgamates many of the concepts proposed in the existing psychological models of BD and some which are not. This PhD aimed to expand on the Self Regulation Model (SRM; Leventhal et al. , 1984) framework to enhance understanding of mood identification and regulation in BD. The mood management model proposed was tested using three methodologies (namely experience sampling, mood induction and a cross-sectional survey design) to provide insight into mood management processes in daily life, following controlled mood manipulation and in response to self-report questionnaires in a large sample of people with BD from across the North West of England and Nottingham. Demonstrating differences between euthymic bipolar participants and healthy controls regarding the psychological processes that underlie the self-regulation of mood may inform psychological interventions. Compared to healthy controls, people with BD reported more variability in mood, perceived more positive consequences, less personal control, less understanding, a shorter duration of mood and made more internal attributions for hypomanic and depressive experiences. Furthermore, while people with BD reported implementing helpful coping strategies (CS) to manage low mood, the most commonly used CS for mania were related to stimulating behaviours that would likely escalate mood and were rated as unhelpful by participants themselves. The current results support the application of the SRM to BD and the importance of expanding this model to explain mood management in BD. The clinical implications, limitations and avenues for future research are discussed.

AB - The clinical effectiveness of psychological interventions for bipolar disorder (BD) may be enhanced by having a coherent psychological model of BD, which amalgamates many of the concepts proposed in the existing psychological models of BD and some which are not. This PhD aimed to expand on the Self Regulation Model (SRM; Leventhal et al. , 1984) framework to enhance understanding of mood identification and regulation in BD. The mood management model proposed was tested using three methodologies (namely experience sampling, mood induction and a cross-sectional survey design) to provide insight into mood management processes in daily life, following controlled mood manipulation and in response to self-report questionnaires in a large sample of people with BD from across the North West of England and Nottingham. Demonstrating differences between euthymic bipolar participants and healthy controls regarding the psychological processes that underlie the self-regulation of mood may inform psychological interventions. Compared to healthy controls, people with BD reported more variability in mood, perceived more positive consequences, less personal control, less understanding, a shorter duration of mood and made more internal attributions for hypomanic and depressive experiences. Furthermore, while people with BD reported implementing helpful coping strategies (CS) to manage low mood, the most commonly used CS for mania were related to stimulating behaviours that would likely escalate mood and were rated as unhelpful by participants themselves. The current results support the application of the SRM to BD and the importance of expanding this model to explain mood management in BD. The clinical implications, limitations and avenues for future research are discussed.

KW - MiAaPQ

KW - Behavioral psychology.

KW - Clinical psychology.

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

CY - Lancaster

ER -