12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor c...
View graph of relations

« Back

Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: another piece of the puzzle

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date2014
JournalJournal of Learning Disabilities
Journal number1
Volume47
Number of pages12
Pages22-33
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Poor comprehenders have intact word reading skills but struggle specifically with understanding what they read. We investigated whether two metalinguistic skills, morphological and syntactic awareness, are specifically related to poor reading comprehension by including separate and combined measures of each. We identified poor comprehenders (n = 15) and average comprehenders (n = 15) in grade 4 who were matched on word reading accuracy and speed, vocabulary, nonverbal cognitive ability, and age. The two groups performed comparably on a morphological awareness task that involved both morphological and syntactic cues. However, poor comprehenders performed less well than average comprehenders on a derivational word analogy task in which there was no additional syntactic information, thus tapping only morphological awareness, and also less well on a syntactic awareness task, in which there were no morphological manipulations. Our task and participant selection process ruled out key non-metalinguistic sources of influence on these tasks. These findings suggest that the relationships among reading comprehension, morphological awareness, and syntactic awareness, depend on the tasks used to measure the latter two. Future research needs to identify precisely in what ways these metalinguistic difficulties connect to challenges with reading comprehension.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47 (1), 2014, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2014 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of Learning Disabilities page: http://ldx.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/