Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Motor imagery of speech

Electronic data

  • Manuscript_revision_2_0

    Accepted author manuscript, 884 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Motor imagery of speech: the involvement of primary motor cortex in manual and articulatory motor imagery

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Motor imagery of speech: the involvement of primary motor cortex in manual and articulatory motor imagery. / Maegherman, Gwijde; Nuttall, Helen E; Devlin, Joseph T. et al.
In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 1, 195, 11.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Maegherman G, Nuttall HE, Devlin JT, Adank P. Motor imagery of speech: the involvement of primary motor cortex in manual and articulatory motor imagery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019 Jun 11;13(1):195. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00195

Author

Maegherman, Gwijde ; Nuttall, Helen E ; Devlin, Joseph T. et al. / Motor imagery of speech : the involvement of primary motor cortex in manual and articulatory motor imagery. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{1153186f946742aaa10a4e78c5a85007,
title = "Motor imagery of speech: the involvement of primary motor cortex in manual and articulatory motor imagery",
abstract = "Motor imagery refers to the phenomenon of imagining performing an action without action execution. Motor imagery and motor execution are assumed to share a similar underlying neural system that involves primary motor cortex (M1). Previous studies have focused on motor imagery of manual actions, but articulatory motor imagery has not been investigated. In this study, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the articulatory muscles [orbicularis oris (OO)] as well as from hand muscles [first dorsal interosseous (FDI)]. Twenty participants were asked to execute or imagine performing a simple squeezing task involving a pair of tweezers, which was comparable across both effectors. MEPs were elicited at six time points (50, 150, 250, 350, 450, 550 ms post-stimulus) to track the time course of M1 involvement in both lip and hand tasks. The results showed increased MEP amplitudes for action execution compared to rest for both effectors at time points 350, 450 and 550 ms, but we found no evidence of increased cortical activation for motor imagery. The results indicate that motor imagery does not involve M1 for simple tasks for manual or articulatory muscles. The results have implications for models of mental imagery of simple articulatory gestures, in that no evidence is found for somatotopic activation of lip muscles in sub-phonemic contexts during motor imagery of such tasks, suggesting that motor simulation of relatively simple actions does not involve M1.",
author = "Gwijde Maegherman and Nuttall, {Helen E} and Devlin, {Joseph T.} and Patti Adank",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "11",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2019.00195",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor imagery of speech

T2 - the involvement of primary motor cortex in manual and articulatory motor imagery

AU - Maegherman, Gwijde

AU - Nuttall, Helen E

AU - Devlin, Joseph T.

AU - Adank, Patti

PY - 2019/6/11

Y1 - 2019/6/11

N2 - Motor imagery refers to the phenomenon of imagining performing an action without action execution. Motor imagery and motor execution are assumed to share a similar underlying neural system that involves primary motor cortex (M1). Previous studies have focused on motor imagery of manual actions, but articulatory motor imagery has not been investigated. In this study, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the articulatory muscles [orbicularis oris (OO)] as well as from hand muscles [first dorsal interosseous (FDI)]. Twenty participants were asked to execute or imagine performing a simple squeezing task involving a pair of tweezers, which was comparable across both effectors. MEPs were elicited at six time points (50, 150, 250, 350, 450, 550 ms post-stimulus) to track the time course of M1 involvement in both lip and hand tasks. The results showed increased MEP amplitudes for action execution compared to rest for both effectors at time points 350, 450 and 550 ms, but we found no evidence of increased cortical activation for motor imagery. The results indicate that motor imagery does not involve M1 for simple tasks for manual or articulatory muscles. The results have implications for models of mental imagery of simple articulatory gestures, in that no evidence is found for somatotopic activation of lip muscles in sub-phonemic contexts during motor imagery of such tasks, suggesting that motor simulation of relatively simple actions does not involve M1.

AB - Motor imagery refers to the phenomenon of imagining performing an action without action execution. Motor imagery and motor execution are assumed to share a similar underlying neural system that involves primary motor cortex (M1). Previous studies have focused on motor imagery of manual actions, but articulatory motor imagery has not been investigated. In this study, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the articulatory muscles [orbicularis oris (OO)] as well as from hand muscles [first dorsal interosseous (FDI)]. Twenty participants were asked to execute or imagine performing a simple squeezing task involving a pair of tweezers, which was comparable across both effectors. MEPs were elicited at six time points (50, 150, 250, 350, 450, 550 ms post-stimulus) to track the time course of M1 involvement in both lip and hand tasks. The results showed increased MEP amplitudes for action execution compared to rest for both effectors at time points 350, 450 and 550 ms, but we found no evidence of increased cortical activation for motor imagery. The results indicate that motor imagery does not involve M1 for simple tasks for manual or articulatory muscles. The results have implications for models of mental imagery of simple articulatory gestures, in that no evidence is found for somatotopic activation of lip muscles in sub-phonemic contexts during motor imagery of such tasks, suggesting that motor simulation of relatively simple actions does not involve M1.

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00195

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00195

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31244631

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - 1

M1 - 195

ER -