Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Multiple perspectives on the challenges for kno...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between Higher Education Institutions and industry

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between Higher Education Institutions and industry. / Lockett, Nigel Jonathan; Kerr, Ron; Robinson, Sarah Katrina.
In: International Small Business Journal, Vol. 26, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 661-681.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lockett NJ, Kerr R, Robinson SK. Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between Higher Education Institutions and industry. International Small Business Journal. 2008 Dec;26(6):661-681. doi: 10.1177/0266242608096088

Author

Bibtex

@article{88ea9f4234d44e96bde53f9c0e04b823,
title = "Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between Higher Education Institutions and industry",
abstract = "Knowledge transfer (KT) has been identified as an essential element of innovation, driving competitive advantage in increasingly knowledge-driven economies, and as a result recent UK Government reports have sought to increase awareness of the importance of KT within higher education institutions (HEIs).There is therefore a need for relevant empirical research that examines, from multiple perspectives, how KT policy is translated into practice within HEI contexts.This article responds to this need by presenting an in-depth qualitative case study based on over 50 semi-structured interviews with university-based academic and non-academic participants and representatives of small firms involved in InfoLab21, a high profile `centre of excellence' for research, development and commercialization of information and communications technology (ICT) in north-west England, UK. The study considers what the key practices of KT are and what promotes and/or hinders their development. Four overarching themes are identified: (1) motivation and reward mechanisms; (2) process management and evaluation; (3) clustering and brokerage; and (4) trust and bridge building. Each theme is considered from multiple perspectives and areas for further research are suggested.",
keywords = "knowledge transfer , regional policy , technology transfer, universities",
author = "Lockett, {Nigel Jonathan} and Ron Kerr and Robinson, {Sarah Katrina}",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/0266242608096088",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "661--681",
journal = "International Small Business Journal",
issn = "0266-2426",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between Higher Education Institutions and industry

AU - Lockett, Nigel Jonathan

AU - Kerr, Ron

AU - Robinson, Sarah Katrina

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Knowledge transfer (KT) has been identified as an essential element of innovation, driving competitive advantage in increasingly knowledge-driven economies, and as a result recent UK Government reports have sought to increase awareness of the importance of KT within higher education institutions (HEIs).There is therefore a need for relevant empirical research that examines, from multiple perspectives, how KT policy is translated into practice within HEI contexts.This article responds to this need by presenting an in-depth qualitative case study based on over 50 semi-structured interviews with university-based academic and non-academic participants and representatives of small firms involved in InfoLab21, a high profile `centre of excellence' for research, development and commercialization of information and communications technology (ICT) in north-west England, UK. The study considers what the key practices of KT are and what promotes and/or hinders their development. Four overarching themes are identified: (1) motivation and reward mechanisms; (2) process management and evaluation; (3) clustering and brokerage; and (4) trust and bridge building. Each theme is considered from multiple perspectives and areas for further research are suggested.

AB - Knowledge transfer (KT) has been identified as an essential element of innovation, driving competitive advantage in increasingly knowledge-driven economies, and as a result recent UK Government reports have sought to increase awareness of the importance of KT within higher education institutions (HEIs).There is therefore a need for relevant empirical research that examines, from multiple perspectives, how KT policy is translated into practice within HEI contexts.This article responds to this need by presenting an in-depth qualitative case study based on over 50 semi-structured interviews with university-based academic and non-academic participants and representatives of small firms involved in InfoLab21, a high profile `centre of excellence' for research, development and commercialization of information and communications technology (ICT) in north-west England, UK. The study considers what the key practices of KT are and what promotes and/or hinders their development. Four overarching themes are identified: (1) motivation and reward mechanisms; (2) process management and evaluation; (3) clustering and brokerage; and (4) trust and bridge building. Each theme is considered from multiple perspectives and areas for further research are suggested.

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - regional policy

KW - technology transfer

KW - universities

U2 - 10.1177/0266242608096088

DO - 10.1177/0266242608096088

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 661

EP - 681

JO - International Small Business Journal

JF - International Small Business Journal

SN - 0266-2426

IS - 6

ER -