Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > National survey of training of psychiatrists on...

Research

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder. / Morriss, Richard; Mudigonda, Mohan; Bartlett, Peter et al.
In: BJPsych Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.12.2017, p. 320-324.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Morriss, R, Mudigonda, M, Bartlett, P, Chopra, A & Jones, SH 2017, 'National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder', BJPsych Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 320-324. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.116.055343

APA

Morriss, R., Mudigonda, M., Bartlett, P., Chopra, A., & Jones, S. H. (2017). National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder. BJPsych Bulletin, 41(6), 320-324. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.116.055343

Vancouver

Morriss R, Mudigonda M, Bartlett P, Chopra A, Jones SH. National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder. BJPsych Bulletin. 2017 Dec 1;41(6):320-324. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055343

Author

Morriss, Richard ; Mudigonda, Mohan ; Bartlett, Peter et al. / National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder. In: BJPsych Bulletin. 2017 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 320-324.

Bibtex

@article{d016146949a74d28ac98c527d1026efb,
title = "National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder",
abstract = "Aims and methodTo determine features associated with better perceived quality of training for psychiatrists on advance decision-making in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), and whether the quality or amount of training were associated with positive attitudes or use of advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRTs) by psychiatrists in people with bipolar disorder. An anonymised national survey of 650 trainee and consultant psychiatrists in England and Wales was performed.ResultsGood or better quality of training was associated with use of case summaries, role-play, ADRTs, assessment of mental capacity and its fluctuation. Good or better quality and two or more sessions of MCA training were associated with more positive attitudes and reported use of ADRTs, although many psychiatrists would never discuss them clinically with people with bipolar disorder.Clinical implicationsConsistent delivery of better-quality training is required for all psychiatrists to increase use of ADRTs in people with bipolar disorder.",
author = "Richard Morriss and Mohan Mudigonda and Peter Bartlett and Arun Chopra and Jones, {Steven Huntley}",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1192/pb.bp.116.055343",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "320--324",
journal = "BJPsych Bulletin",
issn = "2056-4694",
publisher = "Royal College of Psychiatrists",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - National survey of training of psychiatrists on advance directives to refuse treatment in bipolar disorder

AU - Morriss, Richard

AU - Mudigonda, Mohan

AU - Bartlett, Peter

AU - Chopra, Arun

AU - Jones, Steven Huntley

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Aims and methodTo determine features associated with better perceived quality of training for psychiatrists on advance decision-making in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), and whether the quality or amount of training were associated with positive attitudes or use of advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRTs) by psychiatrists in people with bipolar disorder. An anonymised national survey of 650 trainee and consultant psychiatrists in England and Wales was performed.ResultsGood or better quality of training was associated with use of case summaries, role-play, ADRTs, assessment of mental capacity and its fluctuation. Good or better quality and two or more sessions of MCA training were associated with more positive attitudes and reported use of ADRTs, although many psychiatrists would never discuss them clinically with people with bipolar disorder.Clinical implicationsConsistent delivery of better-quality training is required for all psychiatrists to increase use of ADRTs in people with bipolar disorder.

AB - Aims and methodTo determine features associated with better perceived quality of training for psychiatrists on advance decision-making in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), and whether the quality or amount of training were associated with positive attitudes or use of advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRTs) by psychiatrists in people with bipolar disorder. An anonymised national survey of 650 trainee and consultant psychiatrists in England and Wales was performed.ResultsGood or better quality of training was associated with use of case summaries, role-play, ADRTs, assessment of mental capacity and its fluctuation. Good or better quality and two or more sessions of MCA training were associated with more positive attitudes and reported use of ADRTs, although many psychiatrists would never discuss them clinically with people with bipolar disorder.Clinical implicationsConsistent delivery of better-quality training is required for all psychiatrists to increase use of ADRTs in people with bipolar disorder.

U2 - 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055343

DO - 10.1192/pb.bp.116.055343

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 320

EP - 324

JO - BJPsych Bulletin

JF - BJPsych Bulletin

SN - 2056-4694

IS - 6

ER -