Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > New deal for communities as a ‘natural policy e...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

New deal for communities as a ‘natural policy experiment’

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

New deal for communities as a ‘natural policy experiment’. / Halliday, Emma; Popay, Jennie.

SAGE research methods cases. Sage, 2014.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@inbook{00bfcfedb142450b99f8dd6bf70ba0b2,
title = "New deal for communities as a ‘natural policy experiment’",
abstract = "In 2010, we embarked on a study evaluating the impact of an area-based regeneration intervention on health inequalities in England. The policy initiative in question was called New Deal for Communities – a major programme implemented in 39 disadvantaged neighbourhoods over 10 years from 1999/2000 to 2010/2011. Due to methodological and practical challenges, it was not possible to use an experimental design to assess impacts. Alternatively, we deployed methods that allowed us to evaluate the initiative as a ‘natural policy experiment’ using innovative approaches to constructing ‘comparators’. In this case study, we use our experience of this study to explain what natural policy experiments are and why there is growing interest in these among public health researchers. We pay attention to some specific features that are important to consider in the conduct of evaluations of a natural policy experiment such as ours. This includes how to deal with variation in the implementation of policy initiatives, as well as in the characteristics of the areas where these policy initiatives are rolled out. We also focus on the benefits and limitations of using existing data to assess impacts within the time frame of an intervention as well as longer term.",
author = "Emma Halliday and Jennie Popay",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4135/978144627305014529526",
language = "English",
booktitle = "SAGE research methods cases",
publisher = "Sage",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - New deal for communities as a ‘natural policy experiment’

AU - Halliday, Emma

AU - Popay, Jennie

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In 2010, we embarked on a study evaluating the impact of an area-based regeneration intervention on health inequalities in England. The policy initiative in question was called New Deal for Communities – a major programme implemented in 39 disadvantaged neighbourhoods over 10 years from 1999/2000 to 2010/2011. Due to methodological and practical challenges, it was not possible to use an experimental design to assess impacts. Alternatively, we deployed methods that allowed us to evaluate the initiative as a ‘natural policy experiment’ using innovative approaches to constructing ‘comparators’. In this case study, we use our experience of this study to explain what natural policy experiments are and why there is growing interest in these among public health researchers. We pay attention to some specific features that are important to consider in the conduct of evaluations of a natural policy experiment such as ours. This includes how to deal with variation in the implementation of policy initiatives, as well as in the characteristics of the areas where these policy initiatives are rolled out. We also focus on the benefits and limitations of using existing data to assess impacts within the time frame of an intervention as well as longer term.

AB - In 2010, we embarked on a study evaluating the impact of an area-based regeneration intervention on health inequalities in England. The policy initiative in question was called New Deal for Communities – a major programme implemented in 39 disadvantaged neighbourhoods over 10 years from 1999/2000 to 2010/2011. Due to methodological and practical challenges, it was not possible to use an experimental design to assess impacts. Alternatively, we deployed methods that allowed us to evaluate the initiative as a ‘natural policy experiment’ using innovative approaches to constructing ‘comparators’. In this case study, we use our experience of this study to explain what natural policy experiments are and why there is growing interest in these among public health researchers. We pay attention to some specific features that are important to consider in the conduct of evaluations of a natural policy experiment such as ours. This includes how to deal with variation in the implementation of policy initiatives, as well as in the characteristics of the areas where these policy initiatives are rolled out. We also focus on the benefits and limitations of using existing data to assess impacts within the time frame of an intervention as well as longer term.

U2 - 10.4135/978144627305014529526

DO - 10.4135/978144627305014529526

M3 - Chapter

BT - SAGE research methods cases

PB - Sage

ER -