Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > No such thing as the 'Big Society'
View graph of relations

No such thing as the 'Big Society': the Conservative Party's unnecessary search for ‘narrative’ in the 2010 general election

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

No such thing as the 'Big Society': the Conservative Party's unnecessary search for ‘narrative’ in the 2010 general election. / Dorey, Peter; Garnett, Mark.
In: British Politics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 389-417.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dorey P, Garnett M. No such thing as the 'Big Society': the Conservative Party's unnecessary search for ‘narrative’ in the 2010 general election. British Politics. 2012 Dec;7(4):389-417. Epub 2012 Sept 10. doi: 10.1057/bp.2012.17

Author

Bibtex

@article{16cea99f39fb43959bd5635a4cb80970,
title = "No such thing as the 'Big Society': the Conservative Party's unnecessary search for {\textquoteleft}narrative{\textquoteright} in the 2010 general election",
abstract = "David Cameron's advocacy of the {\textquoteleft}Big Society{\textquoteright} in the run-up to the 2010 general election was the culmination of his strategy, as Opposition Leader, to detoxify the Conservative brand, and persuade voters that the Party had moved on from Thatcherism. This article traces the genealogy of the concept, which echoes Edmund Burke as well as several senior figures from the party's more recent history. Despite Cameron's evident enthusiasm for the idea, much of the British public, as well as many Conservatives themselves, remain unimpressed. Indeed, some of them profess uncertainty about what exactly the {\textquoteleft}Big Society{\textquoteright} is: whereas others think they know what it is, and don{\textquoteright}t like it. We argue that the main problems with the {\textquoteleft}Big Society{\textquoteright} relate to context rather than content; it proved easy for critics to portray it as a rationale for spending cuts, which were not envisioned when the idea was being developed, and although it provided the plausible post-Thatcherite {\textquoteleft}narrative{\textquoteright}, which the Conservatives had sought in vain since 1997, it was deployed in an election battle where such a narrative was at best superfluous, and at worst a source of distraction from the perceived failings of the incumbent Labour Party.",
keywords = "Conservative Party, David Cameron, Big Society, citizens/citizenship, localism",
author = "Peter Dorey and Mark Garnett",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1057/bp.2012.17",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "389--417",
journal = "British Politics",
issn = "1746-9198",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - No such thing as the 'Big Society'

T2 - the Conservative Party's unnecessary search for ‘narrative’ in the 2010 general election

AU - Dorey, Peter

AU - Garnett, Mark

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - David Cameron's advocacy of the ‘Big Society’ in the run-up to the 2010 general election was the culmination of his strategy, as Opposition Leader, to detoxify the Conservative brand, and persuade voters that the Party had moved on from Thatcherism. This article traces the genealogy of the concept, which echoes Edmund Burke as well as several senior figures from the party's more recent history. Despite Cameron's evident enthusiasm for the idea, much of the British public, as well as many Conservatives themselves, remain unimpressed. Indeed, some of them profess uncertainty about what exactly the ‘Big Society’ is: whereas others think they know what it is, and don’t like it. We argue that the main problems with the ‘Big Society’ relate to context rather than content; it proved easy for critics to portray it as a rationale for spending cuts, which were not envisioned when the idea was being developed, and although it provided the plausible post-Thatcherite ‘narrative’, which the Conservatives had sought in vain since 1997, it was deployed in an election battle where such a narrative was at best superfluous, and at worst a source of distraction from the perceived failings of the incumbent Labour Party.

AB - David Cameron's advocacy of the ‘Big Society’ in the run-up to the 2010 general election was the culmination of his strategy, as Opposition Leader, to detoxify the Conservative brand, and persuade voters that the Party had moved on from Thatcherism. This article traces the genealogy of the concept, which echoes Edmund Burke as well as several senior figures from the party's more recent history. Despite Cameron's evident enthusiasm for the idea, much of the British public, as well as many Conservatives themselves, remain unimpressed. Indeed, some of them profess uncertainty about what exactly the ‘Big Society’ is: whereas others think they know what it is, and don’t like it. We argue that the main problems with the ‘Big Society’ relate to context rather than content; it proved easy for critics to portray it as a rationale for spending cuts, which were not envisioned when the idea was being developed, and although it provided the plausible post-Thatcherite ‘narrative’, which the Conservatives had sought in vain since 1997, it was deployed in an election battle where such a narrative was at best superfluous, and at worst a source of distraction from the perceived failings of the incumbent Labour Party.

KW - Conservative Party

KW - David Cameron

KW - Big Society

KW - citizens/citizenship

KW - localism

U2 - 10.1057/bp.2012.17

DO - 10.1057/bp.2012.17

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 389

EP - 417

JO - British Politics

JF - British Politics

SN - 1746-9198

IS - 4

ER -