Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Nominal targeting in an economy with government...

Electronic data

  • eer_d_16_00301_manuscript

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Economic Review. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Economic Review, 94, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.02.011

    Accepted author manuscript, 424 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Nominal targeting in an economy with government debt

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>05/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>European Economic Review
Volume94
Number of pages23
Pages (from-to)103-125
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date9/03/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The fiscal policy environment central banks operate in can be radically different with
respect to debt levels, maturity structures and whether or not fiscal adjustments are spendingor
tax-based. Despite this, most analyses of monetary policy delegation schemes typically
ignore the behavior of the fiscal policy maker. This paper investigates whether delegating
either nominal income or price level targets to a monetary authority yields social gains in
an economy with government debt, where the fiscal policymaker, acting strategically, may
support or undermine the policies of the central bank. We argue that the fiscal environment
plays an important role in determining the performance of monetary policy. The gains to
price level targeting typically found in the literature can be overturned at empirically relevant
debt-to-GDP ratios, when debt stabilization is achieved through spending cuts. In contrast
these gains are retained if the fiscal authorities utilize taxes to respond to shocks and stabilize
debt.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Economic Review. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Economic Review, 94, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.02.011