Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Not everybody walks around and thinks “That’s a...

Electronic data

  • BernsteinT_and_R_McLeanOct2014FINAL_rc_editsmmresp

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory and Research in Education, 13 (2), 2015, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory and Research in Education page: http://tre.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 163 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

  • Proof of acceptance date

    Submitted manuscript, 13.4 KB, Word document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Not everybody walks around and thinks “That’s an example of othering or stigmatisation": identity, pedagogic rights and the acquisition of undergraduate sociology-based social science knowledge.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>07/2015
<mark>Journal</mark>Theory and Research in Education
Issue number2
Volume13
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)180-197
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date13/07/15
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This article places itself in conversation with literature about how the experience and outcomes of university education are structured by intersections between social class, ethnicity, gender, age and type of university attended. It addresses undergraduate students’ acquisition of sociological knowledge in four diverse university settings. Basil Bernstein’s concepts of pedagogic identity, pedagogic rights, classification and framing are employed to analyse curriculum and interviews with 31 students over the period of their undergraduate degree. The nature of a sociology-based disciplinary identity is described and illustrated, and it is shown how the formation of this identity gives access to pedagogic rights and the acquisition of valuable capabilities. Addressing the question of whether pedagogic rights are distributed unequally in a stratified university system, it was found that they were not distributed, as might be expected, according to institutional hierarchy. It is argued that the acquisition of university sociological knowledge can disrupt social inequality.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory and Research in Education, 13 (2), 2015, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory and Research in Education page: http://tre.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/