Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Qualitative Inquiry, 23 (5), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Qualitative Inquiry page: http://qix.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 41.9 KB, Word document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On ethnographic knowledge
AU - Atkinson, Paul
AU - Morriss, Lisa
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Qualitative Inquiry, 23 (5), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Qualitative Inquiry page: http://qix.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - We discuss the kinds and degrees of competence that the ethnographer needs to acquire. We consider the “unique adequacy” postulate, proposed by ethnomethodologists, that suggests that in the study of esoteric or specialized domains, the researcher needs to acquire or have previously acquired competence themselves. We suggest that this deserves more critical and nuanced scrutiny, not least given the impossibility of having prior competence in all aspects of a complex organization or activity. We also suggest that we need a more delicate appreciation of types of competence and, hence, of ethnographic knowledge. There is no single prescription, but a more thorough appreciation of the sociology of knowledge will inform ethnographic practice and methodological commentary.
AB - We discuss the kinds and degrees of competence that the ethnographer needs to acquire. We consider the “unique adequacy” postulate, proposed by ethnomethodologists, that suggests that in the study of esoteric or specialized domains, the researcher needs to acquire or have previously acquired competence themselves. We suggest that this deserves more critical and nuanced scrutiny, not least given the impossibility of having prior competence in all aspects of a complex organization or activity. We also suggest that we need a more delicate appreciation of types of competence and, hence, of ethnographic knowledge. There is no single prescription, but a more thorough appreciation of the sociology of knowledge will inform ethnographic practice and methodological commentary.
KW - ethnography
KW - ethnographies
KW - methodologies
KW - qualitative research and education
KW - qualitative research
KW - training
KW - evaluating and extending qualitative methods
KW - decolonizing the academy
KW - pedagogy
U2 - 10.1177/1077800416655825
DO - 10.1177/1077800416655825
M3 - Journal article
VL - 23
SP - 323
EP - 331
JO - Qualitative Inquiry
JF - Qualitative Inquiry
SN - 1077-8004
IS - 5
ER -